Tag Archives: Frantz Kebreau

Legacy of The Democratic Party in Mississippi

“Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of SLAVERY, the greatest material interest of the world…” 

Mississippi Declaration of Secession from the U.S., 1861.


In 1894 Mississippi, the Democratic Party run State Legislature adopted this new flag to commemorate the Confederate States of America and in turn, those “pro-slavery” sentiments.  The Democratic Party maintained control (total control) of the State Legislature for the next 117 years until 2011.

In 2012, the State Legislature has finally come under Republican Party control.

I hope their first order of business is to undue the Democratic Party’s false and negative perception imposed on Mississippians in the form of this flag.


Share Away!!!

Posted in Abraham Lincoln, Democratic Party History, Individual freedom, Myth, Slavery, Stolen History-The Book, The Democratic Party History, The Parties Switched, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The South in not as Southern as You May Think

The South is not as “Southern” as you may Think!!

According to the Pew Social and Demographic site, between 1975 and 2007;

13 million Southerners left the South and migrated to the other three corners…West, Mid-West and the Northeast!

But nearly 19 million non-Southerners moved South in that same timeframe.

Considering that most Southerners have traditionally been Democrats, it looks like Democrats left the South but more Republicans replaced them.

That’s how the South turns “red”.


Posted in Democratic Party History, Myth, Republican, Republican Party History, The Democratic Party History, The Parties Switched | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Democratic Party “Con Game”

Malcolm X: Assasinated by “Black Muslim’s”

“I did many things as a [Black] Muslim that I’m sorry for now. I was a zombie then — like all [Black] Muslims — I was hypnotized, pointed in a certain direction and told to march. Well, I gues s a man’s entitled to make a fool of himself if he’s ready to pay the cost. It cost me twelve years..I’ve learned it the hard way — but I’ve learned it. And that’s the significant thing.”

2 Days Later Malcolm X was AssasinMalcolm X on the Democratic Party’s Political Con Gameated.

Video:  Malcolm X on the Democratic Party’s Political Con Game


Share Away!!!

Posted in Civil Rights, Democratic Party History, Stolen History-The Book, The Democratic Party History, The Parties Switched, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Republican is Named; NAACP Man of the Year

In 1963, Civil Rights Leader Medgar Evers was brutally
murdered in his driveway by a member of the White Citizens Council.  His killer was a White Supremacist and no doubt
a supporter of the one party rule of the Mississippi Democratic Party.


In Fayette, MS just 80 miles away in 1969, a similar Civil
Rights Leader was named Mayor.  He was
the first Mayor of color in the previous 90 years and seemingly the first
Republican since then as well.


The same year, he was named Man of the Year by the NAACP
which, in today’s reality, is a curious distinction for a Republican.


Even more curious is that the Republican was none other than…Charles
Evers, the brother to the slain Medgar Evers.


Today, Charles Ever is 90 years old, a Civil Rights Activist
and he is still a Republican.



“Speaking as a black person, welfare is the worst thing
that’s ever happened to us.”

Charles Evers

BTW…In 1969, elections were won in the Democratic Party Primaries.  Therefore, Evers was a Democrat at the time of the 1969 Mayoral election.  He then became an Independent and later a Republican.

Posted in Civil Rights, Democratic Party History, Republican, Republican Party History, The Democratic Party History | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nov 21 FOX 35 Interview

FOX News 35 Interview in Orlando tomorrow morning.  Check it out.
Share Away


Posted in Events | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Tea Party is Racist?

Tea Party Rally     Last week, I posted a video entitled “Democrat-Dixiecrat Lie”.  In the video, I surmised that of the most
prominent Dixiecrat Senators and Governors who compose the Dixiecrat Party of 1948, 93% of them did not leave the Democrat Party.  They remained loyal Democrats for life.  I had always heard that the “Dixiecrats” had switched to the Republican Party after their failed attempt at solidifying segregation in America forever.


As I am now a loyal Conservative, my curiosity over the matter grew daily until I developed the video and began contemplating the issue
more deeply.  It was not until I received a response to the video did the light bulb turn on.  The response read;

 “When you look at the numbers based on registered voters (and not elected officials), you will find that Most Democrats in the south did switch the Republican Party and their Children eventually became Republicans as well.  This party switch does not change the fact that they are still Conservatives (aka, the Bad Guys)”


I consider myself a Conservative Republican by virtue of two issues:  More Individual Freedom and a Limited government.  The commenter
above is no different then the run of the mill detractors that continue to paint Republicans, conservatives and now Tea Partiers as the “racists among us” but I question the logic.  The Dixiecrat, segregationists, Democrats were clearly in my opinion, “bad guys”, but were
they conservatives?  If I define Conservative as an individual who desires a smaller government and more individual freedom than I argue that
the Dixiecrats were far from conservative.

I’m not quite sure what to call them but they certainly would not approve of the current Tea Party Movement or the calling of Glenn Beck and
company for a return to the Constitution and the ideals of the Founding Fathers.  You see, the current Tea Party movement is by all accounts- clearly Conservative and the Founding Fathers ideal of “all men are created equal” was not shared by the “conservative” Dixiecrats.  Here is a plank from the 1948 States Rights Dixiecrat Platform:

We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race; the constitutional right to choose one’s associates; to accept private employment without governmental interference, and to learn one’s living in any lawful way. We oppose the elimination of segregation[laws to separate the races in public and private establishments], the repeal of miscegenation statutes[laws making interracial marriage illegal], the control of private employment by Federal bureaucrats called for by the misnamed civil rights program. We favor home-rule, local self-government and a minimum interference with individual rights.

In other words, the States have the Right to pass an innumerable amount of laws to restrict, limit, and enforce movements and actions of certain citizens whose rights were guaranteed under the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  That my friend is a
perverse notion of Conservatism.  It sounds like a loose form of fascism to me.  An organization calling for smaller government and more personal freedom is hypocritical in nature if it only applies to some and not all.  The Dixiecrats and anyone calling themselves
a conservative is a hypocrite if their ideas are only meant for one race over another.


I can safely say that the Tea Party movement is the anti-thesis of the Dixiecrats with respect to race and race relations.  There has
never been a call to pass laws to restrict one race over another for the benefit of the one.  When we say smaller government, we mean in all forms for all people.  It is time to truly return to the principles of the Founding Fathers; a limited decentralized government , a recognition
that our freedoms and rights come from God and not from man or government and that these themes apply to all citizens equally without restriction.  That is the Tea Party, that is being a conservative; we are not the “Bad Guy”.


For me, a man of color in the United States of America, the “biggest” governments that existed were the pro-slavery or pro-segregationist governments, both of which required large amounts of laws and police power to enforce.  Of course today we are fighting the same battles in combating a similar form of “big” government requiring 2000 page bills, trillions of dollars of debt, the eventual bloated bureaucracy to regulate it, and a police state to enforce it.  This time, “big” government sees no race.  It will enslave us all.


Frantz Kebreau

Posted in Civil Rights, Individual freedom, Myth, Stolen History-The Book, The Democratic Party History, The Parties Switched | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

History Explains Herman Cain

 If a “black man” complimented a “white woman” in the 1920’s it may have been considered sexual assault. (Until 1967, it was a felony for the 2 races to mix in most of America)

Presidential Candidate Herman Cain

National Press Club, Aug. 2010

If a “black man” complimented a “white woman” between the 70’s and 90’s it may have been considered sexual harassment. (1 generation after racial mixing became legal…the 2 races struggled to un…derstand each other.)

The 2 cases at the National Restaurant Assoc. were found to be baseless by the NRA.  My guess is that it was just a “misunderstanding” along racial lines.

I believe Sharon Bialek the 3rd accuser, to be an opportunist and a liar.

Loving vs. Virginia  – Anti-Interracial Marriage Laws deemed Unconstitutional. 1967
Frantz Kebreau
Posted in Civil Rights, Eugenics, Herman Cain, Individual freedom, Interracial Marriage, Stolen History-The Book | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

Revealing the Truth About the Democratic Party


Democrats see Blacks as "Useful Idiots"
“Of Course He Wants to Vote the Democratic Ticket”

I have done extensive research on the subject because at one point, I was a Democrat.  A few years ago, I was confronted with a fact that I knew to be false but after an investigation into the point, it turned out to be true.  It was that Martin Luther King was a Republican.


This of course forced me to extend my research into other areas.  What else could this Political Science Major be unaware of?  The Truth became stranger than fiction.  The list is quite long so here we go.


President Kennedy had little intention of enacting a Comprehensive Civil Rights Law during his 2 years in office.  Tensions in society were running so high due to the riots and such that by the 1963 State of the Union address he had no other choice but to enact some kind of Law.  Mind you, for the previous 100 years, it had only been the Republican Party who had supported any Civil Rights Legislations (I was not aware of these facts until I was 35 years old);


13th Amendment          Abolished Slavery and Servitude Forever

100% Republican Support

23%  Democratic Support


14th Amendment          Slaves can Become Citizens

94% Republican Support

0%  Democratic Support



15th Amendment          Right to Vote

100% Republican Support

0%  Democratic Support



CRA 1866                   Enacted by the Republican Party                   Equal Rights


CRA 1871                   Enacted by the Republican Party                   Anti-KKK


CRA 1875                   Anti-Discrimination

99% Republican Support

0%  Democratic Support



———–It took another 82 years until the next Civil Rights Act———

———–The Democratic Party blocked every attempt to equalize citizens of color—–


CRA 1957                   Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration

Then Senator Kennedy Voted against this Bill

Filibustered by Democrats


CRA 1960                  Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration

The final version was watered down by then Senator LBJ

Filibustered by the Democrats


CRA 1964          Anti-Discrimination

82% Republican Support

63%  Democratic Support



CRA 1965          Voting Rights

87% Republican Support

75%  Democratic Support



I do not want the “government” to treat me any differently than any other citizen.  Therefore, I consider equality of opportunity and equal voting rights to be the summation of Civil Rights in America.  If anything extra is afforded me or anyone else merely due to the color of their skin, I consider that to be an entitlement and patronizing.


Given my above statement, the Democratic Party, even if you sectionalize them by North and South, has never outvoted the Republican Party in any Civil Rights Law…Ever.  The actual numbers play out like this;


Lifetime Republican Party support for Equal Rights for all Citizens:                     94%

Lifetime Democratic Party Support for Equal rights for all Citizens:                     35%


Now to the point of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  This was a proposal that the Republican Party, during the Eisenhower Administration attempted to put forth but alas, their efforts resulted in the first Civil Rights Law in the previous 82 years…The Civil Rights Act of 1957 formed a Commission on Civil Rights.  The Plan of the Commission was to eventually enact the very Comprehensive Law of 1964.  Remember, this was the Bill that Senator JFK voted against, for political aspirations I’m sure.


JFK had his Justice department write the original Bill in early 1963.  The first version passed the House but stalled in the Senate.  Everett McKinley Dirksen (R), the minority leader in the Senate took it upon himself to REWRITE the entire Bill.  It took him 1 weekend and he had 2 helpers, 1 Democrat and another Republican.


The final version of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was written by a Republican which means that since the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, every Civil Rights Law was written by a Republican with more Republican support than Democratic Party Support.


Due to Dirksen’s tenacity, a cloture vote was successful and the Senate passed the Bill.  It then passed the Houses and became Law.


Some notes about its passage;


Robert Byrd (D) filibustered the Bill…the longest filibuster in American History

William Fulbright (D) voted against the Bill.  He was Bill Clinton’s mentor.

Al Gore Sr. (D) voted against the Bill


Speaking to two Governors on Air Force One, then President LB Johnson was quoted saying, “”I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” according Ronald Kessler’s Book in relation to the Law.


So now let’s explore the Dixicrats.  This has always been misrepresented.  I wrote about it in my book, and I also made a video of it.  Here is the video:




The big question is, did the South really turn “Red” after the CRA of 1964?  Well, I researched that also and found the following conclusions.


Presidential Elections (covering “The Solid South”)

The 11 Former Confederate States


Year                            Blue States                                          Red States


1964                            6                                                               5

1968                            6 (Segregationist Wallace took 5)     5

1972                                                    Landslide

1976                                                    Landslide

1980                                                    Landslide

1984                                                    Landslide

1988                                                    Landslide

1992                            4                                                          7

1996                            4                                                          7

2000                            0                                                         11

2004                            0                                                         11

2008                            3                                                         8


At least in Presidential elections, the Solid South wasn’t so “solid” until at least the year 2000 or 36 years after the CRA of 1964.


Now let’s take a look at the Governorships.


Governorships since 1964

(The 11 former “Confederate States”)


State                            Blue                            Red      Years until a “Red” Gov. was elected


Georgia                       7                                  2                      39 years

Mississippi                 8                                  2                      28 years

Alabama                     9                                  3                      23 years

Louisiana                   6                                  4                      16 years

Texas                           5                                  4                      15 years

South Carolina          5                                  5                      11 years

Arkansas                     9                                  3                      9   years

North Carolina          7                                  2                      9   years

Tennessee                   5                                  4                      7   years

Virginia                       7                                  5                      6   years

Florida                        7                                  5                      3   years


Total                           75                                39


That’s almost 2 to 1 Blue over Red.  I looked at the facts and not the rhetoric. The facts point to a different conclusion all together.  The South did not become “Solid Red” after the CRA of 1964.


After finding out that both Martin Luther King Sr. and Jr. were Republicans, I tend to deal only in facts and not with what I’ve been told.


Last Points


My former party, The Democratic Party says that they are for the “minority”.  In this case, I’ll just say “blacks”.  I believe in neither black nor minority but I defer to their thinking for this discussion.  If that’s the case, then how could the following piece of history have been erased?


Ninety-nine percent of the country does not know the name Hiram Rhodes Revels.  Here is his story and why the Democrats are not for “black” people.


At the end of the Civil War, Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, was captured and subsequently imprisoned for 2 years.  Prior to this time period, Mr. Davis was a Senator from the State of Mississippi.  In 1870, the State of Mississippi filled the vacant post of Mr. Davis with one Hiram Rhodes Revels.  The curious fact behind this exchange is that now Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels did not only replace the President of the Confederacy, but he was also the First Black Senator in U.S. History…and virtually nobody knows his name.


One last point to explain this lack of universal knowledge…Jefferson Davis, The President of the Confederacy was a Democrat and his replacement, Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels, was a Republican.  Democratic leadership today will never share that history with their constituents of which I once was.  That led me to believe that the Democratic Party is more interested in my vote than the Truth.


It gets bit deeper.  13 former slaves became members of Congress between 1870 and 1901.  We as a nation killed our own citizens in a Civil War to FREE 4 Million slaves. 13 of those freed slaves became members of the U.S. Congress and the history books are silent to this fact.  640,000 Americans died in that war and the result was transformational yet, this groundbreaking and profound history is never taught in “left” leaning schools because it does not serve their agenda.  All 13 of the former slaves were Republicans.  I had to sift through the Library of Congress to reveal the following information…here it is for you in a video;




My belief is that the Party’s did not change.  The tactics changed.  They went from Pro-Slavery to Pro-Segregation to Pro-Entitlement, all of which results in nothing beneficial for the prosperity of an individual and is considered by many of my ilk, “Plantation Politics”.


All I want is the Truth and to be treated as an equal, no more and no less; as an equal.  I do not need the Democratic Party telling me that I’m “black” or that I’m a minority who needs their assistance.  I am not a color.  I am Frantz Kebreau, an American Citizen.


For the Democratic Party, it has always been about “Control” over Freedom.  Keeping the Truth from it’s constituents in order to maintain control over them is not what I want from my “Party”


Revealing the Truth About the Democratic Party…On Video


Frant KebreauFrantz Kebreau

CEO, Stolen History

Author of Stolen History



If you would like more information, please take a look at the “Stolen History” Book and Audio versions at the link below.



“The Truth Shall Set You Free!!”

Posted in Civil Rights, Democratic Party History, Individual freedom, Republican, Republican Party History, Slavery, Stolen History-The Book, The Parties Switched | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments