Annihilated African cities, killed population, establishment lies, Timgad and the Richat Structure Atlantis

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,798
Likes
8,266
Featured Thread #1
It's hard to stay silent, when such a tremendous loss of life is accompanied by the establishment lies of unprecedented magnitude. I'm talking about Africa again. This thread is a sort of buildup on the already existing thread: 400 year old Sahara Desert, or why people forgot everything they knew about Africa. Influenced by the recent publicity related to the ancient lost city of Atlantis being located in Africa, I took a hard look at quite a few of the older maps. Based on what I've seen, I did not see any evidence pointing to the African Atlantis being located on top of the Richat "Eye of Africa" structure. What I did see though, was the destruction of the majority of the African continent, together with its cities, as well as with its inhabitants.

Note: As you read the below, it is important to understand, that year 1570 people knew way more about 1570 than we do today. Same goes for people who lived in 1645, 1716, 1802 or any other time in history. They were the witnesses, and not us. Naturally, if you buy the bogus narrative compliant explanation of the cartographers of the past making stuff up, this thread is not for you.

Sahara Desert
... and its fake history
Wikipedia says, "During the last glacial period, the Sahara was much larger than it is today, extending south beyond its current boundaries. The end of the glacial period brought more rain to the Sahara, from about 8000 BC to 6000 BC, perhaps because of low pressure areas over the collapsing ice sheets to the north. Once the ice sheets were gone, the northern Sahara dried out. In the southern Sahara, the drying trend was initially counteracted by the monsoon, which brought rain further north than it does today. By around 4200 BC, however, the monsoon retreated south to approximately where it is today, leading to the gradual desertification of the Sahara. The Sahara is now as dry as it was about 13,000 years ago."

2018
Sahara_Desert_1.jpg


1592
1592_Africa.jpg

1592 Africa

The Issue
Officially, the exploration of Africa was supposed to be happening in the 19th century. The below two map compilation is meant to illustrate the problem we are presented with. It also illustrates the lies we are being deliberately fed. The lies which have become a part of our every day lives.

The official description for the below 1802 map states the following:
  • One of the first maps of Africa to show the true state of geographical knowledge of the continent, hence the vast areas of the map with no information - this was Arrowsmith's style when he mapped Africa, the America's and other parts of the world where geographic information was both unknown and evolving. Aaron Arrowsmith simply stripped away centuries of accumulated myth, misconception and unsustainable guesswork, and took the mapping of Africa back to the bare bones of substantiated fact, leaving the interior as a blank canvas, a challenge to a new generation of explorers. As a picture, many of his predecessors of a century earlier would not have thought of publishing it, as a statement of intent it raised the standard for geographical accuracy above that practiced by the vast majority of his contemporaries" .
Aaron Arrowsmith
aaronarrowsmith_aaron.jpg

All we know about him: Aaron Arrowsmith (1750–1823), migrated to London from Winston in Durham when about twenty years of age, and was employed by John Cary, the engraver. In 1790 he made himself famous by his large chart of the world on Mercator’s projection. Four years later he published another large map of the world on the globular projection, with a companion volume of explanation. The maps of North America (1796) and Scotland (1807) are the most celebrated of his many later productions. He left two sons, Aaron and Samuel, the elder of whom was the compiler of the Eton Comparative Atlas, of a Biblical atlas, and of various manuals of geography. They carried on the business in company with John Arrowsmith (1790–1873), nephew of the elder Aaron. In 1834 John published his London Atlas, the best set of maps then in existence. He followed up the atlas with a long series of elaborate and carefully executed maps, those of Australia, America, Africa and India being especially valuable. In 1863 he received the gold medal of the Royal Geographical Society, of which body he was one of the founders.
The above 1570 Africae Tabula Nova map is, by far, not the only "older" map out there. We can fast forward 120 years to 1690, and see the same picture of Africa. Please feel free to browse through maps of Africa, and verify for yourself. This here was just a short synopsis. For the straight up Sahara Desert related story pease visit the below thread:
KD: And let us be real for a second. Africa was not some distant, and recently re-discovered North or South America. In 1802 scientific society suddenly realized that their knowledge of the neighboring Africa equaled one big fat zero? Did they really discovered 150 miles x 180 miles Lake Victoria in 1858? Checkout below what we knew in 1812 about South America. How much sense does any of this make?

1812 - South_America.jpg

Symbols and Cities
cities_8.jpg

The below red highlighted city symbols appear rather insignificant on some 400 year old maps. Yet, all of those places were populated cities, and their insignificance could be a false assumption. They were occupied by living and breathing human beings. Later on you will see why this notion is important.
In the above 1635 map cutout we can see two very familiar names, which are Cairo and Alexandria (the third, Algiers, is not on the cutout, but it is on the linked map). They sit next to a little city symbol similar to the one below.

Cairo_legend.jpg

Behind each and every one of those tiny highlighted city symbols, there was a city. Let's take a look at some of the cities marked by these city symbols. I chose Cairo, Alexandria, and Algiers, because we know that these cities existed, and still do.

According to the official version, the cities I'm gonna be talking about later on never existed, and reflected on some ancient cartographers imagination (or incompetency).

1572 - Cairo
1572 - Cairo_1.jpg


1572 Alexandria / 1541 Algiers
1572_Alexandria_1.jpg 1541 - Algeria_3.jpg
If you follow this Google search link, you will be able to see other various 16th century city plans (not necessarily Africa related) marked with the same "city" symbol on various maps. The below population numbers are meant to demonstrate the capacity of those cities. Meaning how many people they could allegedly fit within their walls.
Cairo population - link:
  • 1400: 125,000 - 260,000
  • 1500: 400,000
  • 1575: 275,000
Alexandria population - link + link:
  • 700: 216,000
  • 900: 175,000
  • 1800: 8,000
  • 1840: 60,000
Algiers population - link + link:

Kasbah of Algiers citadel alone used to have 150 tiled public water fountains. Today, only six of those remain.
  • 1600: 100,000 with 30,000 additional Christian captives
  • 1881: 65,227
The up and down population number shenanigans are being blamed by the official historians on earthquakes, deluges, tidal waves, plagues, wars and other such things. We all choose what to believe. I, personally, think those excuses are just made up lies designed to hide the true nature of the African cataclysmic events.

Timgad
Pompeii Sahara 2.jpg
Here is an example of the strangeness we are so used to, we consider it normal. The below ruins belong to the city of Timgad, Algeria. Of course, it is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Which means no digging, no touching, and no nothing. What if something unwanted gets discovered? Follows is a short story of Timgard:
  • The city was founded ex nihilo as a military colony by the emperor Trajan around AD 100.
  • KD: ex nihilo means "something coming from nothing". City which came from nowhere?
  • It was originally populated largely by Roman veterans .
  • In the 5th century, the city was sacked by the Vandals before falling into decline.
  • In AD 535, the Byzantine general Solomon found the city empty when he came to occupy it.
  • In the following century, the city was briefly repopulated as a primarily Christian city before being sacked by Berbers in the 5th century.
  • Timgad was destroyed at the end of the 5th century by montagnards of the Aurès.
  • The Byzantine Reconquest revived some activities in the city, defended by a fortress built to the south, in 539, reusing blocks removed from Roman monuments.
  • The Arab invasion brought about the final ruin of Thamugadi which ceased to be inhabited after the 8th century.
  • Because no new settlements were founded on the site after the 7th century, the city was partially preserved under sand up to a depth of approximately one meter.
So, there you have it. We have a city built by God knows who, and made out of nothing 2,000 years ago for some Roman veterans. Destroyed by some mountain dwellers 1,600 years ago, and seized to be inhabited 1,400 years ago.

50,000 citizens - they call it a town
1905_timgad_article.jpg

1905 - The review of reviews. (LOL)

Make sure you read the following 1902 Munsey's Magazine article. You might get surprised what this Roman retirement city for veterans had to offer.

Now check out some of the below pictures, and try to imagine this city when it was thriving. Be honest, how much time would it take us to build such a city today?

Timgad
50,000 citizens
Timgad_Algeria.jpg

timgad_17.jpg

Timgad_14.jpg

Timgad_11.jpg

Timgad_12.jpg Timgad_13.jpg Timgad_15.jpg timgad_18.jpg
Timgad_1.jpg Timgad_2.jpg Timgad_3.jpg Timgad_4.jpg
Timgad_10.jpeg Timgad_5.jpg Timgad_6.jpg Timgad_7.jpg
Timgad_8.jpg Timgad_9.jpg

KD: I simply used Timgad as an example of the destroyed/missing cities this article is essentially about. I honestly doubt that the real name of this city had anything to do with Timgad, or Thamugas. The info about this city magically popped up in 1870s, for all of the survived places have to have their own history. I think this Timgad could be the city of Canatudi on this 1635 map.

It appears that Timgad was on the outskirts of the cataclysm which produced the Sahara Desert, and altered geographical features of the other African areas. As an example I could name the emergence of Lakes Victoria, Tanganyika, and Malawi.

I think this catastrophic event happened around 1666. I could care less for the weirdness of the number, but this African event appears to coincide with the formation of the Santorini Archipelago, which, in my opinion, took place around 1666.

Was this cataclysm man made, or natural? I have no clue. May be these people do.

Missing Cities/Towns
Essentially, if the maps in question contain real cities like Cairo, Alexandria and Algiers, I find no real reason to question past existence of the other cities, or towns present on the same maps. And considering that those "imaginary" cities were marked on multiple maps with the same "city" symbol, I will consider them comparable in size.

city_2.jpg

Now, when we fully understand that behind each one of the above symbols could be 10,000, or 50,000, or 250,000, or 400,000, or whatever number of people, let us take a look at the below map comparison.
1635-1802_African_Vanished_Cities.jpg

1635 - 1802
Now I have a few simple questions. Where did all these cities, and towns go? Not some bamboo huts Wikipedia suggests for a couple of the names, but actual cities, and towns... what happened to them? Cities like the ones in this little passage kindly produced by Google: Doldel, Augesa, Gebaghe. Where is the Lake Sachaf?

Lake_Sachaf.jpg

I was able to find this German book dated 1708. I have no idea what it says, but here are the pages. If our German speakers could help out, would be awesome. 1708 is well into the fake history pubs territory, but at least this book has the names of the above cities.

Also, who was this Rönigreich Damut?

Lake_Sachas_11.jpg

Lake_Sachas_15.jpg

For those enjoying mainstream geographical explanations, here is a 1891 article explaining that 16th century cartographers were dumb, and excessively creative with their maps: Scottish Geographical Magazine.

KD: obvously the above several cities I picked are a drop in the bucket. How many cities, and towns seized to exist? Looks like hundreds did.

The Richat Atlantis
Richat_Structure.jpg
Such a possibility is being discussed in this thread. I think finding Atlantis would be super cool, but I have my doubts that the Richat Structure has anything to do with it. Maps suggest that there was no Sahara Desert a few hundred years ago. In my opinion the Eye of Sahara emerged simultaneously with all the Sahara Desert. In other words, Sahara would have to be thousands of years old for any possibility for the Richat Structure to be Atlantis. As it stands, I think the Eye of Sahara is some sort of a weaponry related crater.

In my opinion the ancient city of Hoden was much bigger than today's Ouadane, located 5 miles south-west from the outer rim of the Richat structure. I have this feeling that the majority of the older Hoden did not quite survive the arrival of the Richat Structure. If you look at these pictures of Ouadane, you may see a few interesting ones.

Hoden_Richat.jpg

Atlantis_Holden.jpg


Craters
I think some type of a weapon could have been used. I have no idea what it could have been (if it was used, where it came from, etc), but we have this interesting dependency between crater locations, and the mapped African deserts. In my opinion, it happened a few hundred years ago.

craters_africa_2.jpg

Saudi Arabia craters are not included on the image
Of course, scientists are saying that it happened millions of years ago. They even know how to differentiate between a 3 mln year old, and a 575 mln year old crater. I think they are full of it, but that is just my opinion on the issue. By pushing these terrible events millions of years back, they created moral comfort on Earth. May be it's a good thing, and may be it is not a good thing.
Maps for your review:
*******​

KD summary: I do think that millions, or tens of millions, or hundreds of millions of people (may be some additional humanoid species too) were killed by this enormous event. In my opinion it happened between approximately 400-500 years ago. The truth is being hidden from public knowledge. That's it. I really have nothing else to add.
 
Messages
18
Likes
53
#2
Awesome!! This is exactly where the entirety of this site is going! Won't be long before we have a timeline, and a reason for why this happened. I had been researching this, tying in with the other posts about winter seasons, and it leads me to believe that the climate changed, but it makes sense in a flat earth model where the sun moves in vertical directions also, and that there might have been two suns in the past more evenly distributing warmth, from a higher elevation. I will open a new thread to this when it is ready.
 

asatiger1966

Well-known member
Messages
133
Likes
545
#3
Nuclear war 70-80,000 years ago. Near history, the European countries raped Africa and enslaved everybody. They put them in human zoos.
The Africans were displayed ,up into the early twentieth century. I think the last one was 1958. One suggestion would be explorers could not go into that area because it still caused death. Just like the "Forbidden Zone" in Russia. scientist and locals, that wander in the zone die of radiation poison like symptoms.
Look at Cape Town South Africa, where did the sand come from?

bolton-1766-map.jpg 30bed3ac4ade857d5d5b423020450093.jpg 11872 Scramble for Africa.jpg what is device behind humans.jpg african-this-is-an-girl-on-exhibit-in-a-human-25857105.png
human-zoo03  Shameful Pictures of Europeans Placing African People ....jpg South-Africa-Cape-Town-2-Cape-Town-Aerial-view-IMG_0088.jpg congo-village-human-zoo Norway actually had a zoo of Senegalese villagers on display for the l...jpg humanzoo story Trapped in a Human Zoo  Human Zoos  A Shocking History.jpg
aerial-view-of-cape-town-south-africa.jpg blue eyes.jpg

Almost forgot this one. Look hard at the caged people?
Another common feature that Korben's maps show is the square design of the cities, reminds me of something?

1 1SLAJdozid8ZpXnA1-UroQ Look hard at the caged humans.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Andromeda

Active member
Messages
48
Likes
125
#4
Nuclear war 70-80,000 years ago. Near history, the European countries raped Africa and enslaved everybody. They put them in human zoos.
The Africans were displayed ,up into the early twentieth century. I think the last one was 1958. One suggestion would be explorers could not go into that area because it still caused death. Just like the "Forbidden Zone" in Russia. scientist and locals, that wander in the zone die of radiation poison like symptoms.
Look at Cape Town South Africa, where did the sand come from?


Almost forgot this one. Look hard at the caged people?
Another common feature that Korben's maps show is the square design of the cities, reminds me of something?

European is a cluster word for all nations within Europe. I think it is important to stress that it was mainly the Anglo-Saxon nations that were involved with enslavement of blacks. Arab Semites were involved too. I reckon the Gothic and Slavic didn't partake in slavery, but most likely had shares in either East India Company or West India Company.
 
Messages
12
Likes
76
#5
European is a cluster word for all nations within Europe. I think it is important to stress that it was mainly the Anglo-Saxon nations that were involved with enslavement of blacks. Arab Semites were involved too. I reckon the Gothic and Slavic didn't partake in slavery, but most likely had shares in either East India Company or West India Company.
I couldn’t help but comment here - almost every race have been slavers at some point (including Africans, Asians, Indians and Pacific Islanders). It was the Anglo-Saxons who put a stop to it in recent times - most slave ships were owned and run by Jewish merchants. The Arab nations were notorious slavers, right up until the early 1900s.
 

Andromeda

Active member
Messages
48
Likes
125
#6
I couldn’t help but comment here - almost every race have been slavers at some point (including Africans, Asians, Indians and Pacific Islanders). It was the Anglo-Saxons who put a stop to it in recent times - most slave ships were owned and run by Jewish merchants. The Arab nations were notorious slavers, right up until the early 1900s.
I agree with you. There were many black slaveholders as well. Indians had their caste system where slaves are allowed. Slaves existed in many Asian nations. But my post was about the enslavement of blacks. The Anglo-Saxons together with the Arab Semites, and the Jews were the biggest slaveholders and if the free men of the world had not demanded an end of slaveholding the Anglo-Saxons wouldn't give in, in my humble opinion. But then again, only the slaveholders could free the slaves only if the free men didn't emancipate them. I think it is correct to say that slavery ended after when US emancipated themselves from the Anglo-Saxon British Empire. But today we have another form of slavery. It is the meaningless 9-5 grind, to be honest.
 

dreamtime

Well-known member
Messages
255
Likes
1,320
#7
I was able to find this German book dated 1708. I have no idea what it says, but here are the pages. If our German speakers could help out, would be awesome. 1708 is well into the fake history pubs territory, but at least this book has the names of the above cities.
Lake_Sachas_11.jpg
Lake_Sachas_15.jpg

Here's a translation:

XI. The coast Zanguebar.

zanzibar.png

Some of the cities mentioned in the text visible on the east coast of Africa: Africae nova descriptio . . .

In this primarily the Portuguese have locked themselves in/entrenchend themselves, divided into the midnight and midday coast.
The northern part consists of 5 countries as 1. The coast of Abex at the Red Sea / therein the country Bafrazania, the kingdom Dangalum, and the kingdom Baloe. 2. The kingdom Adel which has it's own king. 3. The kingdom Adea, which is interest-bearing to the great Neguz. 4. The kingdom Magadoxo with an absolute ruler. 5. The republic of Brava, whose inhabitants consist of Mohammedan.
The midday consists of 6 kingdoms as 1. Melinde, 2. Mombaza, 3. Quiloa, 4. Mozambique, 5. Angoche, 6. Mongallo, in which are lots of Arabs, and big events (trading?) happen.

XII. The kingdom of MONOEMUGI.

monoemugi.png

South Central Africa with some of the cities mentioned as being part of Monoemugi. Africae nova descriptio . . .

Which king calls himself emperor, and he has the King of Malemba in Nieger/Ethiopia as his vasal. But the empire of Monoemugi has within itself 4 kingdoms. 1. Gorga with the capital Gorga, the Trade City Gatsat, the Mountain City Sibir, etc, 2. Gazabale, with the capital Gazabela, which is the residence of the whole empire. 3. Tirut, an extensive empire / in which are the capital Tirut and the stronghold Fort Chicova and Mata Funa. 4. Camur, with the cities Camur, Agoia, Leif, etc.

*The kingdom Malemba lies at the Sea Zembra, in which are the cities Debsan and Zembre.

XII. The kingdom MONOMATAPA.

monomatapa.png

The kingdom of Monomatapa with the capital of the same name in southern Africa of 1635: Africae nova descriptio . . .

Is called empire as well, some think it's both the richest country in Africa and called the Land Ophir. This kingdom consists of the following kingdoms and principalities:
Monomatapa lies at the river del Spirito Sancto, with the capital of the same name. Chetuchim is a Trade City / and Belegura a border fortress.
Vallontego with the capital Vallonta.
Vigiti Magna, with the principality Molcata.
Aybi Gasle, with the capital Aybi Gasle.
Tialso, with Tialso, and Zimbre.
Basar, with the city Basar.
Calburas, which ruler is a vasal of the emperor.
Angesa (Augesa?), directly under the kingdom Damut.
Bera, with the cities Gallilla and Dobbel (Doldel?).
Gebaghe, with the city Gebaghe.
Butua, with Butua as the emperors summer residence.
Maitagali, with lots of Gold and ivory.
Amara, Degme, Meace, and Bamba are kingdoms as well.

XIV. The African islands.
As many different islands there are, they still can be divided into 4 classes: 1. the big island Madagascar 2. the islands of the green foothills 3. The Canarian Islands, 4. lots of smaller islands
(talks mostly about British fortresses, only the British trading with Madagascar, people consisting of Pagans and Mohammedan, and a female King called Anna who has some problems with bandits.)
 
Last edited:

trismegistus

Well-known member
Messages
109
Likes
470
#8
I think it is correct to say that slavery ended after when US emancipated themselves from the Anglo-Saxon British Empire.
Technically, the US never ended slavery in full. See the 13th Amendment:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Edit: I know this comment is off-topic, this thread is pretty fascinating to read over and well researched by @KorbenDallas. If you want to remove for offtopic that's fine I just wanted to clear up a technicality, is all.

Since I'm back here anyway, let me throw my two cents in:
There have been a few threads on here regarding electric universe and the implications of a past that was totally different and very chaotic. Could this Richat structure be the remnants of an extreme electrical event, rather than the footprint of Atlantis?
 
Last edited:

Tonep

Active member
Messages
80
Likes
181
#9
I think the enslavement of blacks is off topic. Im trying to calculate how many people dissappeared and was it all at one time. Excuse my french but thats some crazy shit.
and im black btw
 

dreamtime

Well-known member
Messages
255
Likes
1,320
#10
And exactly the same happened in

- South America
- Northern America/today Canada
- Northern Russia
- Asia
- India

Guess which area was the only one that was basically spared? Europe with the power center of the PTB, and some parts of Western Russia. Every other continent is basically not only in ruins, but 80-100% of the cities that we can all see on the pre-1700 maps disappeared without a single trace. People disappeared without a trace. Entire cultures where swallowed. We live on the cultural ruins of that not-so-distant culture.

Think about it. Let's say at the end of the 17th Century Africa gets destroyed within a couple of days within a single cataclysm of epic proportions. The entire continent is in a state of trauma and confusion. Everything people knew was simply gone, and only a small number of people survived everything. Technical knowledge, architecture, resources, cities, streets, sanitation, infrastructure, everything is gone without a trace. A couple of people survive and decide to become nomads - tents are the ultimate solution to survive another cataclysm, and all the knowledge of building a complex society is gone. Some cities are being partially rebuilt or repopulated, but people live on a very low level compared to before. They flock to the cities that are still standing and are not submerged by sand - mostly in the coastal areas. Then the European rulers decide to overrun the now weak Africa and thus the run on the lands and resources begins. This is the story that happened with South America and Tartaria as well. The question remains what role the PTB played in initiating the cataclysm, and if there was a war accompanying it.

In the northern parts of the world the destruction was so epic that we don't even have any ruins left, like in Africa, the Middle-East or Meso-America.

It doesn't matter where you look (random map), lots of cities are gone, lots of rivers are gone, and lakes are gone as well.

When there's a city that contradicts the official story, it conveniently becomes a "settlement":

Bildschirmfoto 2018-11-20 um 00.14.03.png

Probably hundreds of million people dead and washed off the face of the earth, and 100 years later no one even remembers anything? In what kind of world do we live?
 
Last edited:

trismegistus

Well-known member
Messages
109
Likes
470
#11
When there's a city that contradicts the official story, it conveniently becomes a "settlement":
Ugh, right? It's like when you read mainstream articles about Gobleki Tepe. They are always so quick to say that it was a "society of hunter gatherers". What a joke. Yeah, sure, inbetween picking berries and hunting they had the time to construct a massive city center replete with artwork, sculpture, and a rigid social and religious structure. And then once they finished, they moved on to the next hunting ground!
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,798
Likes
8,266
#12
Thank you very much @dreamtime for the translation. This Monomotapa reference to King Solomon's Ophir was rather interesting, among other things. Funny how the same area is being mined today for fairly similar materials. May be Ophir was not such a made up place after all. Boer wars for the same vicinity come to mind as well.
Wars_boer_map.gif

In general, the translation demonstrates that their understanding of the area back then was way beyond the one allowed by the official narrative. This Scottish Geographical Magazine explanation demonstrates how easy it eventually was to dismiss the real history of the region.

Going back to the catastrophic event itself, figuring out whether it was man made, or natural would probably be next to impossible. We are left with informational bits and pieces which could be logically connected, but that's about it. To be honest, I struggle to understand how something of this magnitude could have hidden from public knowledge. It appears to have been too big of a recent event. The only way to pull this off would be to replace the majority of the world population. But how realistic is that?
 

Radal16

Active member
Messages
39
Likes
207
#13
I literally just read this taken from a 2001 Nexus Magazine article, seems fitting to put it here:

"The damage that Christian missionaries have done to the psychology of human kindness in Africa over the centuries is untold. Missionaries routinely accompanied soldiers who came to steal lands and loot for their home European country. The procedure went as follows: the missionary would stand and read aloud an edict in Latin to whatever villagers had gathered. The edict, completely incomprehensible to the villagers, ordered that each of them must at that moment convert to Christianity or be killed or enslaved. After it was read, the guns and swords were put to work. The soldiers felt justified in their murders through the benediction and authority of the Roman Church. Through varying interpretations of the works of Church fathers, the Roman Church developed a system of permissible murder and looting, and it was used routinely.

The missionaries would then go to work on the remaining people. The children were taught that their parents’ intelligent, peaceful beliefs were “from the devil” and that they were to accept poverty “for the good of their souls”, whereas the conquerers were supposedly blessed by God with superior might and wealth and so had to be obeyed."

Oh, I have to add that I agree with KD about the Eye of the Sahara. First thing I thought when I saw it was "blast crater". As Dreamtime said, clearly there's evidence all over the world of massive devastation that destroyed the life-giving capabilities of the soil. I'd like to add Australia to that list.
 
Last edited:

WildFire2000

Well-known member
Messages
88
Likes
406
#15
This lines up perfectly with my previously mentioned Wild Heretic thread and his study on maps and a cataclysm. The same time frame you're bringing up with the Sanatori island group and the restructuring of Africa lines up with, as Dreamtime mentioned, a world-wide alteration to coastlines, cities, rivers, lakes and everything else. Throw in the advent of snowy landscape paintings that didn't exist before and it shows to me that the world in which we live was altered fundamentally just a few hundred years ago.

Now, depending on your view on the shape of the Earth, this may or may not explain anything, but, I am of the opinion - if anything we are told about space is true, then the Electric Model of the universe is the correct model. It ties the lies of our history together in ways that the conventional Einsteinian physics absolutely does not, which is another discussion entirely. However, the various craters across the planet match cratering patterns that can be replicated in labs using electrical discharges of varying intensity on similar rock or sediments. Some of the maps from Wild Heretic's thread demonstrate that new land was created during the upheaval period, which leads some to believe in the 'expanding Earth' theory. I do not believe that the climate change and alteration of the continents was man-made.

I posted a while back about the cycles of the sun where it goes through a heating and cooling phase as tracked by the number and frequency of sun spots. High and rapid sun spot activity coincides with extreme solar heat and electrical pressure. Low frequency and very slow appearances of sun spots indicate a drastic decrease in solar activity in general, which also would lower it's electrical pressure. If solar science is to believed at all, the cycles seem to run on a 230 year cycle of heating and cooling. We've been going through a heating cycle (supposedly) since 1790-ish, which drops in the middle of all of the crazy map changes. The cooling cycle is supposed to start in 2019/2020-ish, which could potentially reveal whether or not any of this is accurate or not. I'm both looking forward to it and .. not .. because if it IS true, the last time this happened the Earth went to Hell. I don't want to have to climb back out of that again.
 

asatiger1966

Well-known member
Messages
133
Likes
545
#16
I think the enslavement of blacks is off topic. Im trying to calculate how many people dissappeared and was it all at one time. Excuse my french but thats some crazy shit.
and im black btw
My comments were intended to consider the possibility of a nuclear war by persons unknown. Then a follow up operation, after it was safe to enter the dead zone, called a Desert. To discredit the survivors that still had memories of their grandfathers building many advanced empires. As shown by existing ruins and still standing megaliths.
One way to make people forget their past is to traumatize them using one stimulus then change the stimulus often. They will forget their own history and start to trust you and the lies your teaching. Slavery and its accompaniments would accomplish that goal. Memory gone.

But do not overlook that the people observing this process taking place are being traumatized, desensitized as well, the endgame for the parasites, that nuked Africa in the first place; is to create willing participants from the observers.

My comments are never intended to offend anyone ever, if I did I apologize.
 

asatiger1966

Well-known member
Messages
133
Likes
545
#18
Technically, the US never ended slavery in full. See the 13th Amendment:
Edit: I know this comment is off-topic, this thread is pretty fascinating to read over and well researched by @KorbenDallas. If you want to remove for offtopic that's fine I just wanted to clear up a technicality, is all.

Since I'm back here anyway, let me throw my two cents in:
There have been a few threads on here regarding electric universe and the implications of a past that was totally different and very chaotic. Could this Richat structure be the remnants of an extreme electrical event, rather than the footprint of Atlantis?
The 13th Amendment: , the real one was: " Titles and Nobility" had nothing to do with slaves. It prevented anyone with a title from being a part of congress. Esquire is a British title, it means loyal to the British Bar Association. Your right no lawyer could be in Congress. It was ratified by a two state margin. Since the commutations were so bad the people never had a chance to read it. But the State Legislatures voted the amendment in as law. It was recorded into their State Constitutions as law. The last one was removed in the mid fifty's.

This was what I meant when I said that the British had to burn the White House down, to destroy the original amendment.
 

Tonep

Active member
Messages
80
Likes
181
#19
Another question i have: what did we do to receive such a god-awful punishment. If "they" can destroy entire cities with minimal loss of life, what would make them destroy this many people.

Ill tell u one thing, a month ago i didnt think the rabbit hole covld go any deeper. Ha!
My comments were intended to consider the possibility of a nuclear war by persons unknown. Then a follow up operation, after it was safe to enter the dead zone, called a Desert. To discredit the survivors that still had memories of their grandfathers building many advanced empires. As shown by existing ruins and still standing megaliths.
One way to make people forget their past is to traumatize them using one stimulus then change the stimulus often. They will forget their own history and start to trust you and the lies your teaching. Slavery and its accompaniments would accomplish that goal. Memory gone.

But do not overlook that the people observing this process taking place are being traumatized, desensitized as well, the endgame for the parasites, that nuked Africa in the first place; is to create willing participants from the observers.

My comments are never intended to offend anyone ever, if I did I apologize.
No offense taken, as it has been said, all races have enslaved and been enslaved aut compared to the subject in this post slavery is almost a none issue, imo.

You think the europeans did this?
That is some interesting place they chose to place Jerusalem at on this 1886 South Africa map. Wonder why?...

View attachment 12773

One more African Jerusalem map: 1880 Das Capland
(almost the same as
1875 Das Capland)
View attachment 12775
And on this 1886 Map, it looks like they renamed Jerusalem to Koranna. Go figure.
Today the area looks like this: Google Maps link.

In the process found this two videos on YouTube.


Some African Jerusalem map links from the video description:
  • G.W. Colton, Southern Africa 1886: link
  • A.J. Johnson, Africa 1870: link
  • A.J. Johnson, Africa 1886: link
  • Adolf Stieler, Das Capland 1875: link
  • Adolf Stieler, Das Capland 1880: link
  • George Bacon 1900: link
  • George Bacon 1890: link
  • Richard Andree, Deutsch Süd-Afrika 1905: link
  • Richard Andree, The Times 1895: link
  • Merensky, Gallica 1887: link
  • Black, Adam, Charles 1854: link
  • Richard Kiepert, Paul Sprigade, Deutsch-Südwest-Afrika 1893: link
  • Bacon’s Large Print Map, Transvaal, Orange Free State 1900: link
  • Paul Sprigade, Max Moisel, Deutsch-Südwest Afrika 1912: link
  • F.A. Brockhaus Leipzig 1894: link
  • Francesco C. Marmocchi 1858: link
theres a jerusalem in virginia too
 
Last edited:

Verity

Well-known member
Messages
60
Likes
314
#20
Thank you very much @dreamtime for the translation. This Monomotapa reference to King Solomon's Ophir was rather interesting, among other things. Funny how the same area is being mined today for fairly similar materials. May be Ophir was not such a made up place after all. Boer wars for the same vicinity come to mind as well.
In general, the translation demonstrates that their understanding of the area back then was way beyond the one allowed by the official narrative. This Scottish Geographical Magazine explanation demonstrates how easy it eventually was to dismiss the real history of the region.

Going back to the catastrophic event itself, figuring out whether it was man made, or natural would probably be next to impossible. We are left with informational bits and pieces which could be logically connected, but that's about it. To be honest, I struggle to understand how something of this magnitude could have hidden from public knowledge. It appears to have been too big of a recent event. The only way to pull this off would be to replace the majority of the world population. But how realistic is that?
"To be honest, I struggle to understand how something of this magnitude could have hidden from public knowledge. It appears to have been too big of a recent event. The only way to pull this off would be to replace the majority of the world population. But how realistic is that?"

Well.. was just reading through a bit you linked to on Algiers/Casbah and I happened to copy this bit out to save for later- could be relevant:

"On Rue Bleu he passes the former home, now abandoned, of the late Mostefa Lacheraf, [...] in which he called the Casbah a monde aboli, an “abolished world.” “The Casbah,” says Mamu, “is not as it once was. Too many people live here now with no memory of what came before, neither its culture nor its history, nor of what happened here at independence and during our struggle.”

“Only 10 percent of the Casbah’s homes are occupied by their owners—all the other residents are squatters from the countryside,”

This situation sounds just like that in London, St. Petersburg, et al. when the 'squatters from the countryside' began streaming in to the cities after whatever happened, happened.
(Also somewhat (ominously) concurrent to the influx of refugees/immigrants perhaps...)
Perhaps those outside of the cities had their relatively continuous or preserved food/water supply, as some farmers, preppers and hunters still do today (it's an extremely strong instinct in a few gardening circles online and in one place IRL.)
Those in the cities- those who survived the initial..? blast? Waves? Hits? Bolts?- would have starved, or suffered from disease. As Asatiger said, the psychological fallout would have made them putty in the hands of whomever had the wherewithal to take control from the wreckage.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
mythstifieD Questionable Ancient History 10

Similar threads

Top