Today's Date
"I can’t tell you exactly what year it is because we honestly don’t know," said Morpheus in The Matrix. Well, may be we don't know what year it is today, but there clearly are some people out there, who know that we do not know. We have at least two such individuals:
Heck, may be they don't know that we do not know either. But in this case they know some individuals who told them that we do not know...

I have seen enough pieces to form a concept in my head, but putting it into words supported by relevant images... it's gonna take a few days. This is definitely not what I'd prefer to write about, but I can't ignore the observed.
  • Our Hungarian, Russian (and other European) readers might find the below article quite entertaining and disturbing.
For me, it all started with the below 1591 excerpt.
  • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Beala.
    • It took the origin from the Kings of Hungary.
  • Do you see any house of Beala in the official narrative?
  • Here is what we should have had in the below excerpt:
    • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids.
    • The Rurik line ruled from 862 until 1610.
KD: This Beala vs Rurikids issue appears to be a humongous historical red flag.
  • It's a teaser. Links are gonna be down below when we get to the issue.

Historical Lies
That said, I believe that the above "quoted" book is merely a reflection of the historical narrative they had in 1590s. Fortunately for us, it is much harder to lie when your contemporaries are still alive. In 1591, their current historical narrative could be altered only so much.
  • From this perspective, in 1591, they simply could not say "the Imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids", because at the time when the book was published, that simply was not the case.
  • On a separate note, even as far back as 1591 is supposed to be on the time line, they already did not really know their history, imho. We have some amazing research tools & resources at our fingertips these days. They did not.
We all have our opinions, and in my opinion, we live in a jar of historical lies labeled "TRUTH". Our society has been marinating in this jar for so long, that lies ended up becoming our reality. I doubt that the label will ever change.
Chronology #1
I do understand that there are those, who fundamentally disagree with Fomenko's findings. To disagree, one would have to verify his calculations, and point out where this Ph. D. in mathematics was wrong.
  • As it stands, according to Fomenko, Jesus was born in 1152 AD.
    • That would be 2021 - 1152 = 869 years ago.
  • I came to think, that Jesus was not a living being, but rather an event, from which we chose to count our years.
Here are additional reasons to consider that Jesus was an Event and not a Living Being:
May be further research into the Zodiac Circle could help us to determine what four major events were supposed to signify.
  • The conceiving of Jesus by Virgin Mary.
  • The birth of Jesus.
    • Sagittarius is a centaur, but the key aspect (imho) is the arrow (or spear), suggesting an attack.
      • ♐
    • Considering that the assumed year of his birth is between 6 and 4 BC, we should be asking questions in reference to the AD/BC split.
  • The death of Jesus.
    • Aries is Latin for "ram".
      • ♈
    • Wasn't Jesus the Lamb of God?
  • The Resurrection of Jesus.
    • How do we go from Aries (Sacrificial Lamb) to Pisces (Fishes) in 3 days.
      • I have no idea...
    • Pisces is the twelfth and final astrological sign in the Zodiac.
      • ♓
    • It spans 330° to 360° of celestial longitude.
The resurrection of Jesus, or anastasis, is the Christian belief that God raised Jesus on the third day after his crucifixion.
  • For the Christian tradition, the bodily resurrection was the restoration to life of a transformed body powered by spirit, as described by Paul and the Gospel authors, that led to the establishment of Christianity.
  • They conclude that Jesus was most likely crucified on April 3, AD 33.
Jesus vs. Fish
One way or another, but Jesus became associated with fish. There are a few theories out there on how this Jesus-Fish connection might have originated. The entire thing even got its own name: Ichthys.
  • The ichthys is a symbol consisting of two intersecting arcs, the ends of the right side extending beyond the meeting point so as to resemble the profile of a fish.
  • The symbol was adopted by early Christians as a secret symbol.
  • It is now known colloquially as the "sign of the fish" or the "Jesus fish".

This here is claimed to be one of the earliest circular ichthys symbols, created by combining the Greek letters ΙΧΘΥΣ.


We sure have an explanation, where every single letter in ΙΧΘΥΣ is explained. Somehow, I doubt that we get the intended meaning though.
  • How do we know that this is not some date from I, from IX or of/from "pisces"?
    • ... the numeric values of the letters are added together to obtain the total.​
    • For example, 241 was represented as ΣΜA (200 + 40 + 1).
    • It was not always the case that the numbers ran from highest to lowest: a 4th-century BC inscription at Athens placed the units to the left of the tens.
  • How do we know it's not some Bible verse?
  • What's up with the wheel? Could it be the Ezekiel's Wheel +1?
    • Who knows, may be the IX monogram is somehow related to this wheel...

Ichthyo is a combining form meaning “fish,” used in the formation of compound words. For example - ichthyology. For myself, I see an obscured reference to water, as in ... may be "we are all fish in the water"... just speculating.

I am Alpha and Omega
In the New Testament Book of Revelation, God says, “I am Alpha and Omega,” meaning that he is the beginning and end of all things. In the Greek alphabet, alpha is the first letter and omega is the last.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
  • Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.
  • And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

Well, May be Jesus was the beginning for some, but he sure was the end for others. I think what we have hiding behind this words is this:
  • Jesus Event = Apocalypse
The Bible
In my opinion, there are no predictions in the Bible, because it was written after certain events took place. The narrative can claim whatever they want to. Facts speak for themselves. The great uncial codices or four great uncials are the only remaining uncial codices that contain (or originally contained) the entire text of the Bible.
  • Codex Vaticanus– c. 325–350
    • The Codex is named after its place of conservation in the Vatican Library, where it has been kept since at least the 15th century.
  • Codex Sinaiticus– c. 330–360
    • discovered in 1844
  • Codex Alexandrinus– c. 400–440
    • It derives its name from Alexandria where it resided for a number of years.
    • Then it was given to Charles I of England in the 17th century.
  • Codex Ephraemi– c. 450
    • Go figure. My guess it was "discovered" some time in the 19th century.
When we take "dated" out of the equation, the oldest copy of the Bible text source is no older than generous 1400s. There are no prophets. There are those who know, and those who do not, imho.

Historical Sources
Reading between the lines of the existing historical lies is the best source of truth we have, imho. Just like I mentioned in the beginning of this article, it was harder to lie about some 1627 AD in 1627 AD than it is in 2021 AD. Seeking out details extracted from those 1627 AD lies could point us towards some of the (more or less) truthful facts.


Historical sources include documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, features, oral transmissions, stone inscriptions, paintings, recorded sounds, images (photographs, motion picture), and oral history. Even ancient relics and ruins, broadly speaking, are historical sources.
Those, who genuinely tried to figure out the sources of our alleged knowledge of the events of the past know that:
Manuscript Forgery
It appears that our historical narrative has a hidden, or rather unadvertised pandemic. The amount of made up documents is truly astounding. There is no possible way to determine where the lies end and the truth begins.

  • The Donation of Constantine is a forged Roman imperial decree by which the 4th-century emperor Constantine the Great supposedly transferred authority over Rome and the western part of the Roman Empire to the Pope. Composed probably in the 8th century, it was used, especially in the 13th century, in support of claims of political authority by the papacy. In many of the existing manuscripts (handwritten copies of the document), including the oldest one, the document bears the title Constitutum domini Constantini imperatoris.
  • William Henry Ireland (1775-1835) and John Payne Collier (1789-1883) are two of the most well-known forgers of early modern documents. While Ireland focused almost exclusively on Shakespeare forgeries, Collier was more broad-reaching in his fakes.
  • Forgery was rife in the medieval era, with some of Europe’s leading holy men cooking up reams of counterfeit documents. As modern scholars have established, over half of the surviving texts in the names of the Merovingian rulers of early medieval France and Germany (c481–752) are fakes; a third of those in the names of the Lombard rulers of northern Italy (568–774) are suspect; and similar figures hold true of the nearly 2,000 documents of pre-Conquest England.
  • A new book claims that England’s Gospels of St Augustine and Ireland’s Book of Kells, among other famous medieval manuscripts, are fakes.
  • The Spanish Forger is the name given to an unidentified individual who, in the late 19th to early 20th century, created a large number of forgeries of medieval miniatures. The Spanish Forger's works were painted on vellum or parchment leaves of genuine medieval books, using either blank margins or scraping off the original writing. He also "completed" unfinished miniatures or added missing miniatures in medieval choir books. His works fooled many experts and collectors at the time and appear today in the collections of many museums and libraries. Over 200 forgeries have been identified.
  • In April 2015, about year and a half before the Beyond Words exhibition opened, I contacted some of its organisers to suggest that the illuminated manuscript in which this miniature is found should perhaps not be included in the exhibition.
  • Margaret M. Mitchell of the University of Chicago, together with experts in micro-chemical analysis and medieval bookmaking, has concluded that one of the University Library's most enigmatic possessions is a forgery.
  • Forgeries tell us much about any civilization. Look at what people are forging, and we will learn what matters to them most. Christians of the early Middle Ages were earnestly counterfeiting relics of saints, to create tangible evidence of supernatural beliefs which they longed to validate. In twelfth-century Europe, people fabricated land charters, inventing documentation of title to feudal property on which livelihoods and society depended. In the sixteenth century, it was commonplace to concoct spurious ancestors, faking up complex family trees for the ambitious, in a time when social ranking was a necessity for advancement.
Additional links covering various historical forgeries.
KD: As you can see, they've been forging everything... what's real out there? Nothing?

Industrial Progress
It appears that in our PTB provided understanding of the "linear" progress of humanity, we forgot what a beast critical thinking was. In reality, to get us out of the proverbial "technological" darkness, we only needed two people, Tesla and Trouvé:
Considering that we were also given two industrial revolutions, it somehow ended up not being at all suspicious that it only took us 156 years to go from a hot air balloon to a turbojet powered aircraft.
Welcome to the BS: While our ancestors have been around for about six million years, the modern form of humans only evolved about 200,000 years ago. Civilization as we know it is only about 6,000 years old, and industrialization started in the earnest only in the 1800s.
  • In other words, for approximately 199,800 (99.9% of 200,000) years humans were idiots, while possessing the same brain.
    • Early Homo sapiens had brains within the range of people today, averaging 1,200 ml or more.
Chronology #2
If you want to learn all the BS about AD and BC, here is your link. For us, it's important to recognize that there is a split there indicating "before" and "after". "Before" is a totally separate topic I will touch up on later. "After", or Anno Domini, aka AD, is something we do need to cover:
  • The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin and means "in the year of the Lord", but is often presented using "our Lord" instead of "the Lord", taken from the full original phrase "anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ".
  • Where is Jesus Christ hiding in "Anno Domini"?
Let's take a look at the Second Epistle of Peter 3:10:
  • But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
  • KJV Source
Then we have these calculations performed by biblical scholars of the past.
  • Year 437 AD - the precise Year from whence the Lord of Times and Seasons thought good to date the beginning of his Times, or Reign.
Questions: Is the "Year of the Lord" and "Anno Domini" even the same thing?
  • Judgement by fire is indicative of the Apocalypse times.
  • If this is when the "Day of the Lord" comes, and we count from the "Year of the Lord", wouldn't it mean that the Apocalypse has already happened?

My Understanding of the Time Line
I do not see how we can figure out what year we live in. The entire BC/AD split appears to be highly questionable by now. The mere fact that our ancestors, for whatever reason, decided to count their years from a certain "Jesus Birth Event" (that allegedly happened four to six years prior to the BC/AD split) sounds somewhat suspicions. Unfortunately, we are way too used to this "Anno Domini" by now.
  • Here is my vision of the time line.
  • I do not insist on the specific dates. At the same time, in order to put things on a time line, we do need chronological points of reference.

Considering that the most powerful ruler of the Hunnic Empire was Attila the Hun, it only makes sense to start with the country of Hungary. Today it's a tiny landlocked country in Central Europe. Some will argue that Attila the Hun had anything to do with Hungary as a country:
  • Attila was Hun, not Hungarian. Only the English name of the magyarok (the Hungarians) make this notion sound plausible, but in fact Attila lived earlier in present day Hungary before the arrival the Hungarians to the Carpathian basin.
  • Source
The issue appears to be way more sophisticated, and it just may be, that Attila the Hun ended up influencing many countries, Hungary included.


Tobolsk is a town in Russia, located at the confluence of the Tobol and Irtysh rivers. Founded in 1590, Tobolsk is the second-oldest Russian settlement east of the Ural Mountains in Asian Russia, and is a historic capital of the Siberia region.

Why are we talking about the city of Tobolsk? Here is why.

Is there any supporting evidence of the Hunnic Empire occupying Siberian lands? Some people think that there might be some.
Time frames provided on the image below are obviously narrative compliant ones.


The above "Point #1" is right about where the city of Tobolsk is. What else do we know about the city of Tobolsk?

On the below map, we can see where Sibir (10 miles from Tobolks), the capital of Tartars used to be at.


We know that Attila made it to right about here. If he really did hang out somewhere in the vicinity of Sibir/Tobolsk, than his empire was a bit bigger than we were told.


This is probably an appropriate moment to introduce Noah into the picture.


Translated by @Silveryou in here: ...roughly "Here Noah, prince of the Tartars and imperator (in the litteral sense of highest commander/general) of 600 armed men (not completely sure about the word preceding 600, therefore the meaning could be different), commands and moves (in the sense that this is his territory)"
  • edit: not "imperator" but "imperat", therefore he "commands upon" and not "the imperator of"... maybe
Noah is also present on plate 3 of the below 1516 Map.
  • Lat: Hic dominatur et ambulat contra persos Noy princeps tartarorum et imperator super sexingenta [milia added by hand] armatorum virorum qui omnes prouincias tam Cristianorum quam Saracenorum a capite persie usque ad Syriam sue ditioni subiungavat.
  • Eng: Here rules and marches against the Persians Noah, prince of the Tartars and commander of 60,000 soldiers who has brought under his control all of the countries, both Christian and Saracen, from the top of Persia to Syria.
  • Noah (lived 600 years before the Flood, and 350 after the Flood)

On the plate 3, we also have Batu Khan:
  • Lat: Hic ambulat et dominatur Bathot Magni imperatoris Cham princeps maximus de Casana et imperator super sexingenta [sic] .m. armatorum virorum tam christianorum quam Saracenorum qui cum exercitu suo tempore Estiuali super ripam fluminis ad montes ascendit, tempero uero hyemali ad mare descendit.
  • Eng: Here Batu lives as a nomad and rules, the greatest prince of Casana [and descendant] of the great emperor Chan, and commander of sixty thousand soldiers, both Christians and Saracens, who with his army ascends over the riverbank to the mountains in the summer, but in the winter descends to the sea.
  • Batu Khan (c. 1205–1255)
    • Batu or Baatu, better known today as Batu Khan of the Golden Horde, was son of Jochi, and thus a grandson of Genghis Khan.

On plate 4 of the same 1516 Map we can see Gog Khan.
  • Lat: Magnus Tartarum Gog Chaam Rex regum et dominus dominantium.
  • Eng: The great Tartar Gog Khan, king of kings and lord of lords.
  • Question: Who was Gog Khan (or Hun)
Gog Khan.jpg

Note: Translation for the above 1516 map was obtained here. Not surprisingly, they claim that Noy does not mean Noah.

Noah's Family Tree

The below info was dismissed by the narrative compilers as total BS, which means we could be on the right track. Sources are:

The below passage suggests that Ninus was Nimrod's grandson. We may, or may not need this detail later.


That's a big a*s empire I've never heard of... what about you?



I don't know if any of the above was of any assistance leading the reader to Attila the Hun, but there you go.



This "empire fell apart" story reminded me of the Alexander the Great narrative.
  • Additionally, there is a situation, where we have approximately 2300-2500 year gap between Nimrod and Attila. Chances are, this is how devious historical lies are.
  • I did not try to track down two sons of Attila, neither did I try to figure out which one of the Nimrod's nephews could be Attila. This article is getting long as it is, and I'm not even close to being done.
Hun = Khan?
I think we were fed a bunch of phantom empires here, where the Hunnic Empire and the Golden Horde Empire are one and the same. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few other "empires" would fall into the same "phantom" category. Let's take a look...

The Hunnic Empire (370 AD - 459 AD): ~ 89 years
  • No one knows exactly where the Huns came from.
  • Some scholars believe they originated from the nomad Xiongnu people.
  • Other historians believe the Huns originated from Kazakhstan, or elsewhere in Asia.
  • Prior to the 4th century, the Huns traveled in small groups led by chieftains and had no known individual king or leader.
  • They arrived in southeastern Europe around 370 A.D. and conquered one territory after another for over 70 years.
  • By 459, the Hun Empire had collapsed, and many Huns assimilated into the civilizations they’d once dominated.
  • Source
This is like pretty BS: came from nowhere, and disappeared into nowhere.
  • This is like super convenient for them controllers, "No Body, No Crime".
Let's take a look at a narrative compliant map of the Hunnic Empire.


Empire of Alexander the Great (336 BC - 323 BC): ~13 years
  • He succeeded his father King Philip II to the throne at the age of 20 .
  • By the age of thirty, he had created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to northwestern India.
  • He was undefeated in battle and is widely considered to be one of history's most successful military commanders.
  • Several factors caused the sudden collapse of the Empire that Alexander built. These include:
    • the early and the somewhat unexpected death of the great king,
    • absence of a capable successor,
    • rebellious generals,
    • the size of the territories Alexander had invaded
Sounds like a military fairy tale with an end similar to that of the Hunnic Empire. It's almost like Alexander knew not to invade areas the Hunnic Empire was gonna invade 700 years later.


The Golden Horde (1242 AD – 1502 AD): ~260 years
  • The Golden Horde was originally a Mongol and later Turkicized khanate established in the 13th century and originating as the northwestern sector of the Mongol Empire.
    • At his death in 1227, Genghis Khan divided the Mongol Empire amongst his four sons as appanages, but the Empire remained united under the supreme khan.
  • With the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire after 1259 it became a functionally separate khanate.
  • You'd have to read the narrative, because it's rather creative.
The size is deceiving, because the Golden Horde was a part of a much bigger Mongol Empire.


The Mongol Empire (1206–1368): ~162 years
  • The Mongol Empire of the 13th and 14th centuries was the largest contiguous land empire in history and the second largest empire by landmass, second only to the British Empire.
  • The Mongol Empire emerged from the unification of several nomadic tribes in the Mongol homeland under the leadership of Genghis Khan (c. 1162–1227), whom a council proclaimed as the ruler of all Mongols in 1206.
  • The empire began to split due to wars over succession, as the grandchildren of Genghis Khan disputed whether the royal line should follow from his son and initial heir Ögedei or from one of his other sons, such as Tolui, Chagatai, or Jochi.
  • Source

The Ottoman Empire (1299–1922): ~623
  • At its peak in the 1500s, the Ottoman Empire was one of the biggest military and economic powers in the world.
  • The empire controlled its territory with a powerful military, lucrative commerce, and impressive achievements in fields ranging from architecture to astronomy.
  • But it didn’t last. Though the Ottoman Empire persisted for 600 years, it succumbed to what most historians describe as a long, slow decline, despite efforts to modernize.
  • What caused the once awe-inspiring Ottoman Empire collapse? Historians aren’t in complete agreement.

The Timurid Empire (1370-1507): ~137
  • The empire was founded by Timur (also known as Tamerlane), who established the empire between 1370 and his death in 1405.
  • He envisioned himself as the great restorer of the Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan, regarded himself as Genghis's heir.
  • The power of Timurids declined rapidly during the second half of the 15th century, largely due to the Timurid tradition of partitioning the empire.
  • By 1500, the divided and wartorn Timurid Empire had lost control of most of its territory.

An Opinion: I think the below map is indictive of a common denominator. Whether Tartary, Scythia, or whatever other name it might have had.

1754 Map


We can picture it this way too... may be.


East vs. West
- everything most likely comes down to this -
  • I will try to elaborate on the maps portion of the article in the overall summary.

Rurik vs. Beala
I finally made it to what I actually wanted to talk about. So, we have this issue, where we are faced with an example of a major historical inconsistency. Here is what we have in every contemporary textbook:
  • Russia has no history prior to 862 AD. The ancestors of modern Russians are the Slavic tribes, whose original home is thought by some scholars to have been the wooded areas of the Pinsk Marshes, one of the largest wetlands in Europe.
  • The rest of the BS mambo jumbo is see here.
Pinsk Marshes.jpg

The establishment of the first East Slavic states in the 9th century coincided with the arrival of Varangians, the Vikings who ventured along the waterways extending from the eastern Baltic to the Black and Caspian Seas.
  • According to the Primary Chronicle, a Varangian from the Rus' people, named Rurik, was elected ruler of Novgorod in 862.
This "Primary Chronicle" has the same issue all other pre-1400s documents do.
  • Tradition long regarded the original compilation as the work of a monk named Nestor (c. 1056 – c. 1114); hence scholars spoke of Nestor's Chronicle or of Nestor's manuscript.
    • His compilation has not survived.
  • Because the original of the chronicle as well as the earliest known copies are lost, it is difficult to establish the original content of the chronicle.
  • The two main sources for the chronicle's text as it is known presently are the Laurentian Codex and the Hypatian Codex.
  • The Laurentian Codex was compiled in what are today Russian lands by the Nizhegorod monk Laurentius for the Prince Dmitry Konstantinovich in 1377.
  • The Hypatian Codex dates to the 15th century. It was written in what are today Ukrainian lands and incorporates much information from the lost 12th-century Kievan Chronicle and 13th-century Galician-Volhynian Chronicle.
    • Galician Volhynian Chronicle was discovered in 1809 by the Russian historian and opinion writer Nikolay Karamzin as a final part of the 15th century Hypatian Codex.
    • Kievan Chronicle is known from a single copy in the 15th-century Hypatian Codex, where it is sandwiched between the Primary Chronicle and the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle.
These comic books do look cool though.


Conclusion: Rurik was the one who started an organized state. To a certain degree, he was the founder of Russia.
  • That is per the narrative.
The Narrative: The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor, which states that Chuds, Eastern Slavs, Merias, Veses, and Krivichs "drove the Varangians back beyond the sea, refused to pay them tribute, and set out to govern themselves".
  • Afterwards the tribes started fighting each other and decided to invite the Varangians, led by Rurik, to reestablish order.
  • Rurik came in 860–862 along with his brothers Sineus and Truvor and a large retinue.
Question: Where did the current narrative lose the fourth brother Variuus?


1591 Source

- The 4 -
I've been saying for a long time that in our field of research, patterns are everything. Every single book, no matter how old it is, was pre-printed or pre-written with an incorporated set of lies. In this case we have four individuals establishing or continuing countries and empires.

  • 1 - Assyrius
  • 2 - Medus
  • 3 - Moscus
  • 4 - Magog
  • 1 - Trubor
  • 2 - Rurico
  • 3 - Sinees
  • 4 - Variuus
  • 1 - Kio
  • 2 - Scieko
  • 3 - Choranus
  • 4 - Libeda
The Empire of Alexander the Great
The Mongol Empire
There gotta be more, methinks...
  • Four kingdoms of Daniel: The four kingdoms of Daniel are four kingdoms which, according to the Book of Daniel, precede the "end-times" and the "Kingdom of God".
The Rurik Issue
Let's see what various texts have to say in reference to what house or dynasty the Russian royalty used to belong to. We are supposed to see Rurik for the surname. Here is straight out of wikipedia. I've included Hungary, because this is how I got into this entire mess.

Now look at the image below. Ignore the "cruelty" portion. The PTB started orchestrating their narrative a very long time ago. Fortunately for us, at some point in time they could not switch last names because it would have been too obvious.
  • Who is Ivan Vasilyevich Beala?

From the book it is obvious that the ruler at hand is Ivan (the 4th) Vasilyevich Ririk aka Ivan the Terribe (1530-1584). That is per the current narrative.

Note: From here on Beala = Béla due to the way this name can also be spelled.


The only Turk of such significance out there (imho) is Mehmed the Conqueror (1432-1481)

Per the narrative, there are four kings named Bela in the House of Árpád.
Note: All four of these Béla's belong to the Arpad dynasty. Nowhere in the todays narrative do we see the Béla dynasty.


The Árpád Dynasty
The Árpáds were the ruling dynasty of the Principality of Hungary in the 9th and 10th centuries and of the Kingdom of Hungary from 1000 to 1301. The dynasty was named after Grand Prince Árpád who was the head of the Hungarian tribal federation during the conquest of the Carpathian Basin, c. 895.
  • It is also referred to as the Turul dynasty, but rarely.
  • Both the first Grand Prince of the Hungarians Álmos and the first king of Hungary Saint Stephen were members of the dynasty.
  • Seven members of the dynasty were canonized or beatified by the Roman Catholic Church;
    • therefore, since the 13th century the dynasty has often been referred to as the "Kindred of the Holy Kings".
    • Two Árpáds were recognized as Saints by the Eastern Orthodox Church.
  • The dynasty came to end in 1301 with the death of King Andrew III of Hungary, while the last member of the House of Árpád, Andrew's daughter, Blessed Elizabeth of Töss, died in 1336 or 1338.

The Turul Dynasty

As it says above, the Arpad Dynasty was also referred to as the Turul Dynasty. The Turul is a mythological bird of prey, mostly depicted as a hawk or falcon, in Turkish tradition and Hungarian traditions. It is a national symbol of Hungarians. The name "Turul" is probably based on bla-bla-bla...
I don't know how old our English language is, but this bird's name sure sounds like "To Rule". Anyways...


It is also said that the mythic bird, the Turul, is the original bird of the original Hungarians, the Magyars, who migrated out of the plains of Central Asia. The legend says that in 896 AD, the bird dropped its sword in what is now modern day Budapest, indicating to the Magyars that the area was to be their homeland.
Note: And how about them little coincidences...




Source - 1581 Source - 1664 Source

Toruk Makto
Apologies, could not help it. A Toruk Makto is a Na'vi individual who successfully manages to ride a great leonopteryx (Na'vi name: toruk). There had only been five Toruk Maktos prior to Jake Sully, and they are spoken of with great respect and honour.

Árpád (c. 845 - c. 907)
Árpád was the head of the confederation of the Magyar tribes at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. He might have been either the sacred ruler or kende of the Hungarians, or their military leader or gyula, although most details of his life are debated by historians, because different sources contain contradictory information.

  • Despite this, many Hungarians refer to him as the "founder of our country", and Árpád's preeminent role in the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin has been emphasized by some later chronicles.
  • The dynasty descending from Árpád ruled the Kingdom of Hungary until 1301.
Rurik (c. 830 - 879)
Rurik, according to the 12th-century Primary Chronicle, was a Varangian chieftain of the Rus' who in the year 862 gained control of Ladoga, and built Novgorod in the same year. This legendary figure was considered by later rulers to be the founder of the Rurik dynasty, which ruled the Kievan Rus' and its successor states, including the Kingdom of Ruthenia, the Principality of Tver, Grand Duchy of Vladimir, the Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Novgorod Republic and the Tsardom of Russia, until the 17th century.


  • The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor.
    • The credability of this "Primary" chronicle was covered above.
  • Source
The Rurik Dynasty
The Rurik dynasty, or Rurikids was a dynasty founded by the Varangian prince Rurik, who established himself in Novgorod around the year AD 862. The Rurikids were the ruling dynasty of Kievan Rus' before it was finally disintegrated in the mid-13th century, as well as the successor Rus' principalities and Rus' prince republics of Novgorod, Pskov, Vladimir-Suzdal, Ryazan, Smolensk, Galicia-Volhynia (after 1199), Chernigov, and the Grand Duchy of Moscow (from 1263).
  • The Romanovych branch of the dynasty ruled central and western Rus'. These territories were unified by Roman the Great and his son Danylo, who was later crowned king of Galicia–Volhynia.
    • This Roman the Great and Danilo (some Daniel?) are uber interesting. Anything "Roman" should be scrutinized, especially when on paper these "Romanovich" people have nothing to do with the dynasty of Romanoffs.
  • After the line's extinction, the kingdom was absorbed by Poland and Lithuania, and the title of its king eventually passed to the ruler of Austro-Hungary.
  • Continuous Rurikid sovereignty from the ninth century to the fourteenth represents part of Ukraine's historical process.
  • In Ukrainian historiography, Rus' civilization - sometimes called Ukraine-Rus' - is not considered to have ended in 1240, but merely to have shifted its centre slightly westward.
As a ruling dynasty, the Rurik dynasty held its own in some parts of Rus' for a total of twenty-one generations in male-line succession, from Rurik (died 879) to Feodor I of Russia (died 1598), a period of more than 700 years. They are one of Europe's oldest royal houses.

Ivan III of Russia

Ivan III Vasilyevich (1440 -1505), also known as Ivan the Great, was a Grand Prince of Moscow and Grand Prince of all Rus'. Ivan served as the co-ruler and regent for his blind father Vasily II from the mid-1450s before he officially ascended the throne in 1462.
  • He tripled the territory of his state, ended the dominance of the Mongols/Tatars over Russia, renovated the Moscow Kremlin, introduced a new legal codex and laid the foundations of the Russian state.
  • His 1480 victory over the Great Horde is cited as the restoration of Russian independence 240 years after the fall of Kiev to Mongols' invasion.
  • Ivan was the first Russian ruler to style himself "tsar", albeit not as an official title. Through marriage to Sofia Paleologue, he made the double-headed eagle Russia's coat of arms and adopted the idea of Moscow as Third Rome.
  • His 43-year reign was one of the longest in Russian history, second only to that of his grandson Ivan IV (The Terrible).
  • Ivan III of Russia - The Rurik Dynasty - (1440 -1505)
Important: If Ivan the 3rd really said this, it should turn the entire historical narrative of Russia upside down.
In semi-normal English: That their ancestors came not of the Russe nation, Ivan III Vasilyevich father to this Emperor - Vasily III (1479-1533) - would many times boast disdaining (as should seem) to have his progeny derived from the Russe blood. As namely to an Englishman his goldsmith, that have received bullion of him to make certain plate: whom the Emperor commanded to look well to his weight. For my Russes (said be) are thieves all. Whereat the workman looking upon the Emperor, began to smile.
  • The Emperor (Ivan III of Russia) being of quick concept, charged him to tell him what he smiled at.
  • If your Majesty will pardon me (quote the goldsmith) I will tell you.
  • Your highness said that Russes were all thieves, and forgot in the mean while that yourself was a Russe.
  • I thought so (quote the Emperor) but was deceived.
  • For I am no Russe, my ancestors were Germans, for so they account for the Hungarians to be part of the German nation, though they indeed come from the Huns, that invaded those countries and rested in those parts of Pannonia, now called Hungary.
The below excerpt could (probably) also explain why Russia was being run (for so long) by the Holstein-Gottorp Dynasty.

In simple terms... Ivan III of Russia stated that his ancestors were Huns.

Note: A particular attention should be paid to the "Blind" issue:

Which one of the Bela Kings was the blind one? This one was:
Conclusion: The name of the dynasty of Russian tsars aka czars comes from this Bela II of Hungary, This is what the above paragraph clearly states. It is also obvious that Huns were the ancestors of Ivan II of Russia, per his own claim.
Empires and Individuals
I do start to think that historical doubles, triples and possibly quadruples are probably more numerous than we could possibly imagine. I doubt that we have gazillions of different "never lost a battle" / "scourge of God" / same area covering people. I think we might a few multiplied into a "legion". In the end, we get thousands years of history. Thousands years of history we do not really have. Some of these doubles do not share the exact same biography, most are separated by hundreds and thousands of years, but all of them do contribute to the overall lies we are faced with.
  • Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” “My name is Legion,” he replied, “ for we are many."
For more info on historical doubles you should probably look up Mr. Fomenko. These are the most obvious ones I notices while compiling this article.
"Horned" ones were always serious conquerors and warriors:
Events fall into the same category:
Though Attila does throw somewhat of a monkey wrench into the framework. Why does he have the double-headed eagle (or Turul) there?



When did Attila become a Roman emperor?
  • Ten roundels with bust-length portraits of Roman Emperors, with Augustus on the top flanked by plants and fruits, and three rows of three roundels, each with the sitter's name on a small tablet below the image; illustration to Weigel's 'Sculptura historiarum et temporum memoratrix' (1679).
  • Source


Note: I think these are the prototypes for our historical doubles. Different Peter the Greats, Arpads, Bealas, Tamerlanes, Alexander the Greats and Ivan the Terribles were just phantom copies of the above presented individuals (or individuals similar to them).

Additional Links & Info:

KD Summary: To be honest, this stuff is beyond my ability to process information. I think I am able to grasp the concept. At the same time, to systemically analyze the situation we are in, that would probably require a faculty. Here are a few final points I'd like to make. These are just my thoughts:
  • I suspect a much shorter time line of the known history. I understand that it sounds a bit insane, but we have what we have.
  • I start to think that 400s, 1400s,1600s and 1800s possibly cover the same events. These events are outfitted with different names and uniforms, but they nevertheless are the same events. That is in my developing humble opinion.
  • ~1870s is probably where we can start looking for the beginning of our "known" times... but then we run into SF 1906 and SF 1915.
View of Campo Vaccino in Rome_1_1.jpg
  • I do think that the Bible was written after approximately year 1400 AD on the common timeline.
  • Jesus Christ is not a person. It's "Jesus Events" that we call Jesus Christ,
  • "Jesus Events" happened at least twice. The first one was accompanied by Water, the second one by Fire.
  • Timing of these "Jesus Events" is hidden in the rotating celestial bodies. That would be different Zodiac circles.
  • Peter the Great is not a real name, or if it is a real name, it belonged to someone else.
  • Google Ngram is one of the best research tools we have, and we need to use it more often.
  • All printed historical books contain lies. It's even worth with the handwritten text materials.
  • It's been East vs. West, for a relatively short period of time.
    • Was it Tartary olim Scythia representing the East?
  • Or... was it Controllers vs the survivors of various Jesus Events?
Those who know our true history and who possess sacred knowledge must also know when the next cyclical catastrophe is due to occur. It's become quite obvious why the man-made global warming farce was introduced into the collective consciousness all those years ago. They knew what was coming and they needed something they could blame it on. Anything to keep people from discovering the truth about these naturally reoccuring cycles and of our fragile existence here on Earth.

I'm curious if you seen any of Douglas Vogt's Diehold Foundation videos on YT? He's the guy who claims to have figured out that our Sun Novas every 12,068 years like clockwork. He says the nova causes Earth's pole to shift and is also responsible for every one of our Ice Ages. He claims it will Nova next in the year 2046.
Yup, I’ve seen him. I think he is from WA as well. Sure does sound convincing, interesting and highly educated. Even if he is correct, his calculations are based on the conventional heliocentric space data... distances, sizes, celestial cycles, etc. If our Sun is local, that would suggest that so are the stars. 12,068 years is not quite my understanding of the world clock. May be he is arriving to the same results coming from a different direction. Who knows?

For those interested:

I’m not buying these catastrophes happening every 11-15k years. 200 to 500, and I’m in.

If the guy is correct, and this event does happen every 11-15k years, then we have nothing to worry about, because the last one happened within the last 500 years, or may be 250 years. Yet, 2030, or in his case 2046, or 2048, is coming up.
Ultimately, something wasn’t too well anticipated...that was the mixture of two implemented systems: economy based social systems and fail-proof/long lasting machinery.
I like your reading, but it fails to take account for certain facts, especially associated with cartels/families that seem to have pirate-like intentions of plunder and slavery. For example, both oil and petrochemical medicine are controlled and were initiated by Rockefeller. Painting the controlling hand as anything but suspiciously dubious is a failure almost enforced on us in academics, where we were taught to never question "the conspirators"-- in fact, we were taught to think and write in generalities about such phenomena as technology. (See, for example, Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, 1977). A terrific critique is generated; but history shifts into soft-focus-- making substantial reform exceedingly difficult.

On resets, an ex-con, who spent most of life in prison, reading the classics of alternative history like a monk, postulates that resets occur every 138 years. The last one was in 1902. 2040 is supposed to be a doosie. In prison, he couldn't keep up with the kind of research done here, but he has been catching up on some "mudflood" theory. His name is Jason Breshears.
Last edited:
I like your reading, but it fails to take account for certain facts, especially associated with cartels/families that seem to have pirate-like intentions of plunder and slavery. For example, both oil and petrochemical medicine are controlled and were initiated by Rockefeller. Painting the controlling hand as anything but suspiciously dubious is a failure almost enforced on us in academics, where we were taught to never question "the conspirators"-- in fact, we were taught to think and write in generalities about such phenomena as technology. (See, for example, Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, 1977). A terrific critique is generated; but history shifts into soft-focus-- making substantial reform exceedingly difficult.

On resets, an ex-con, who spent most of life in prison, reading the classics of alternative history like a monk, postulates that resets occur every 138 years. The last one was in 1902. 2040 is supposed to be a doosie. In prison, he couldn't keep up with the kind of research done here, but he has been catching up on some "mudflood" theory. His name is Jason Breshears.
I see, my aim wasn’t for accuracy but a creating a model to start differentiating certain stories and peoples into the right age/time period.

I’ll take your comments for example and contextualize them for my system.

The shifty characters of which you speak, I would classify them as predominantly emerging in the 6th era I mention. They’re tasked with a combination of deconstructing the pinnacle of the 5th era technology and implementation of both ‘wear and tear systems’ AND markets/industries that have a firmer grasp on narrative control. They seem sketchy, because they are from the perspective of all the confused people who’ve been on the other end of their task.

I don’t necessarily subscribe to the notion that all in power are totally corrupt. I believe there are those whose roles are to deliver severity (distinct from cruelty, like the necessary harsh king) and those who are actually ill-moraled but ultimately just playing the middle-man or means to an end role; like a mushroom network that is itself toxic but functions to filter those toxins out of the soil. I would go far as to say the Hidden Hand might date back from the 4th era I mention, and their influence has closer or further proxy to the harbingers of the 3rd era. I do agree with the sentiment that a relatively small group tends and prunes this realm like a garden.

On the subject of resets. To say that they have a schedule I think is soft-focused. It’s more realistic to think they are context dependent. I think deconstruction goes hand and hand with construction. People and cultures are often mixed and moved around, and this is on the more minor end of a ‘reset event spectrum’ because ultimately a people who loose their foundation become a malleable resource for testing new ideas. On the other end of the reset spectrum is ‘natural cataclysm and War’. The former we still see today at minor scales in the form of weather systems annihilating places like New Orleans or Haiti in the west, and the later—war, is as pervasive in certain areas as it was in the past, the narratives and perspectives are more tightly controlled and exposed. On the subject of mud flood, It would make sense that the victors of the 3rd era still have the means to liquidation and level/expose buildings among other sensitive tools/weapons, they have less necessity to continually deploy them on a few accounts:
  • their competition is mostly gone, thus they it’s not necessary to expose their existence for deterrence purposes
  • It’s easy to continue to deconstruct through the guise of modern/post modern war events
  • It’s likely that there exist many sensitive listening instruments that could possible detect the operation of such devices, so they are used infrequently if ever now
  • Less drastic measures are necessary now that narrative control is virtually seamless via use of media and mainstream language technology. Not many question the patriotic story of their country’s capitol building.
Another thing to consider is that a reset implies a fixed or stable system that can be de-stabilized or re-formatted. In my model, I would argue there hasn’t been any consistency in the affairs of man since the start of the 4th era. Studying the change of language is enough to vignette the reality that very few institutions could be seen as ‘resettable’ (I’m mean sure Confucian is pretty damn stable, but I believe it was setup intentionally to be one of the few systems to be such). Besides the shift from Classical to Foundry and then Foundry to Post-Modernity I don’t see much other major resets. Since the distinction of each of these periods is both the global scale/presence and uniqueness of the technology developed; these I see as the three distinct era of civilization builders, others are stylistic localities or merged remnants(whereas the fundamental differences in say Samurai of Japan and the Knights Europe are derivatives in style and not disparate or global enough to delineate a call for the necessity of reset).


Here is the of the number system in my last post for reference (slightly reworded, go to original for more details):
  1. Classical Era, superior beings/Lords of man spread civilization everywhere, peak of knowledge and technology
  2. Empires and Hordes, descent into madness, lots of these deeds are reshaped into narratives ascribed to men in later time
  3. Destruction of original civilization by the victors of the warring in 2th era, common man spared and left in the ruins of the old world
  4. Rise of Mankind, standing on the shoulders of giants. Most of early written records from this time, lots of cargo cult, plagiarism, and wearing /adopting the vacant mantles left in the vacuum of the preceding era.
  5. Foundry Rise and Peak, First global attempt to re-introduce old knowledge
  6. Failure of the Modern (foundry) infrastructure, and beginning of reset via war and ‘tabula rasa’ of many remnant cities of old.
  7. Current, post-modern era
And another quick description on the topic of man’s involvement in this historic idea:

1st and 2nd era are LOTS of stuff happening but regular man plays a small role on this stage. Recorded events start picking up after 3rd and really get going at through the 4th.

4th is jam packed with history, a lot of it is different versions of the same story recorded in the various peoples ‘historic myths’, likewise the artifacts of 1 and 2 were appropriated by the self made rulers of 4. 5 really starts picking up once the harbingers of 3 start implementing wisdom from 1 to develop the industry and rapid innovative growth that distinguishes 5 from 4 (during 4, this remaining group from 1/2 era devoted much efforts to preservation and had not yet started influencing the affairs of man to dramatically). 5 may be much longer period than initially imagined, consider the whole blimp and steam car era. Much of the memory, technology, and history of 5 was lost in 6. Because the generations of 5 were still accustomed to the plethora of furnishing from the 1 era, and at that time the tenets of the 4th era still had a sound grasp on the imagination of the 5th era, until the science of the 6th era gradually detached the masses them in favor of universalism. (This science etc. which as in development since the 4th era by 3rd era preservers, but it was not yet appropriate for the global population of 5th era)

a poster on the other forum mentioned Ahashvrerosh in the most recent post discussion. I’d place him (or the dominance of this kingdom) in the transition of 3rd to 4th era. His rule might have been the start of the transition of power from the mighty of old to the common man. Thus he had dominion and influence over all, but ultimately his impression left such a distinct impression on all the rising kingdoms of man that each recalls their own story and narrative of his rule (or possibly by design?).
This is a 1992 childrens book "operation save the Earth" from UNESCO to all children in the world following agenda 21

It says here that if we don't cut CO2 within 30 years (that is about now) we will be roasted.
Well... I'm starving in Holland now (it's cold!!)

Your brain updates itself to the current situation and you forget when this was written (people can be 10-20 years off date in memory, like vintage items from their parents that they remember that it was much older for instance)
That's why they burn libraries. That is written evidence.
Now Wikipedia just updates itself according to the narrative because if you don't follow the narrative you're out.
And that is truly dangerous for our historian knowledge.

People and cultures are often mixed and moved around, and this is on the more minor end of a ‘reset event spectrum’ because ultimately a people who loose their foundation

I wondered today how this happend.
I mean total abandoned places, people fled to other countries, a whole society just gone...

I am from a medium size village and I moved 5 km away (that feels like emigration to me because of a provence line... ) and when I do shopping in my "old" village I see the same people I saw 40 years ago doing the same things as always.
They all got stuck in that village, exchange their husbands and wives from the same village when divorced so on birthdays it's like "hey that's my ex, he's with my best friend now. Oh that's another ex, he's with my neighbour!"

I've lost my foundation more than once in life but I got only 5 km away from my birthplace.
I feel stuck but where do I go without money, 2 cats and no job or home in the future place. I'm not that adventourus.

People don't like to move so there must have been a major event in my opinion.
But what event?

You are no doubt right that not all those of the controller class are worthy only of scorn. This morning I read this, for example:

Yesterday of the great fighters of fluoridation in the UK has passed away. Earl Baldwin (grandson of former British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin) was aged 83....

One of those causes was ending water fluoridation. His most prominent work in this respect was working with the scientists who produced a review of fluoridation in 2000 (McDonaugh et al, 2000). This report was dubbed the York Review. He not only helped to make this review open and transparent, but protected it in the House of Lords from the misrepresentation it received from the promoters of fluoridation in the UK.

If there any hope of staving off a context-dependent reset, we need the help of people such as he.

I still think Breshears is very interesting and exceedingly well researched. He talks about many chronological issues with hard detail and passionate cross-referencing. His recent reset dates, 1902, 1764, 1626, and 1488, share uncanny correspondences with the times suggested by KD.

He is also utterly convinced we live in a hologram-- a mathematical matrix. I sometimes think we live in an upper rung of hell -- just enough perfect beauty to remind of the possibilities of deliverance. At the same time, just enough corruption, mayhem and temptation to make it clear what is truly valuable. Maybe, while we're here, some ascend; others prepare for the next round (my guess: the inoculated); and another groups gets dropped deeper into the
abyss. But I really don't know.
Last edited:
Messengers have no idea what they are advertising. Those who placed this date in their heads probably do.
In a way, I'm a pagan. And the magnetic poles are shifting.
Mother earth is moving her inner core.
There is no way that us arrogant humans can think that with filling our earth with windmills and solarpanels and Tesla's and buren ancient woods that we can reverse that.
That is just for the benefit of the current powers that tells us lies so we will pay for this new energy.

His recent reset dates, 1902, 1764, 1626, and 1488, share uncanny correspondences with the times suggested by KD.
so 1902 would roughy correspond do my era 6. Typically the typical narrative starts the era of industry around late 18th century. However my model suggests that there was much more to it, and what we see is only the later end, where all the more advanced technology had already been mostly dispatched (steam ships/cars, blimps and airships, atmospheric electricity, etc.)

i think the periods of time that were likely ‘stretched out’ are those typical of the era preceding the Foundry. Paintings and portraits and records are easier to plagiarize than structure (or in our case the absence of structures and machines).

the 1768 catastrophes could indicate the erasure of high foundry period ie. the proclaimed ‘start’ of the industrial revolution is actually just the start of the modified historThose of 1626 and 1488 may correspond to events that played out in a much shorter time frame upon a similar era of people (name the era 4 in my model). So the events and stories of era 4 is stretched out into (and covers up) much of the high peak of era 5. 1768 imitated the process that 1902 would seek to finish—the re-imagining of the foundry great period into the industrial revolution that followed centuries of relatively slow technological progression (the time that was stretched).

as an analogy. The 4th era used the remnants of the 1/2 eras to establish credibility in their narratives, in a like manner, the 6th era used the 4th era to essentially do the same. The major resets of the 3rd and 6th era were ultimately responsible for fracturing our ability to contextualize the time line. Since we place many 1/2 era stories in the 4th era and so much of the 5th era vanished into the ideas and history of the later developments and aesthetic style of the 4th era.

the end result is we have very little actual information on the period I call the foundry. The mainstream version of history that plays out from recorded history to the industrial revolution takes place over a massive timescale and it seems the idea of a prolonged 15th-18th century narrative of the Arabic, the Spanish, revolutions all over the place, colonialism, and what not...was used to cover up the missing time.

I know the focus has been on added time to the timeline, but we are essentially saying the same thing when we completely erase an era and then fill in a thousand years of history with stories.

on the subject of a holographic realm. I’m currently working on an article that will address this idea, perhaps not in the way you imagined. I do hope it will answer many questions and fill in many gaps, such as what were St. Peter’s Keys and how could it be easy for a hidden hand to cookie cut so many narratives while also seeming to maintain enough fidelity to a believable time line. That article I’ll calll the framework and it’s a pretty cool idea.
There is no way that us arrogant humans can think that with filling our earth with windmills and solarpanels and Tesla's and buren ancient woods that we can reverse that.
That’s if their true purpose was to put us in Teslas, rather than to stop extracting oil and gas.

I’ve heard an opinion that our so-called “nonrenewable fossil fuels” are anything but nonrenewable and fossil based. By extracting those we relieve the pressure and minimize the volume of the constantly replenished combustibles.

That same opinion suggested that reducing volumes and pressure were the true and only reasons to switch from steam and electric powered engines.

I don’t know if there is any credibility to the notion that we are sitting on top of a ticking bomb capable of causing worldwide liquefaction producing earthquakes, but stranger things have happened. May be it’s time for the controllers to reset the clock, and they are not trying to save the planet but rather to whack us all. Who knows?

And this here is just an interesting video. How much stuff is down there, and is it really nonrenewable?

It seems reasonable based on various creation stories from all across the realm that one of these species was our progenitor and at one point, something major happened to mostly eliminate these species from the current world... some combination of cataclysm (natural or artificial), great war, mass exodus, etc.
According to the recent Cassiopaea's communication in (Session 13 March 2021):
(Joe) Is it true that the really tall giants - like 13 or 15 feet - were they alive under the same gravitational conditions as we have today?

A: Not exactly. Conditions on your planet changed significantly at the time of the destruction of the Roman Empire. Giants from that time forward faced increasingly difficult conditions and survival became untenable.

Q: (L) So there were some still left in pockets, is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Those were the ones discovered by explorers after the Dark Ages.

(Chu) Did they have a language we might be familiar with if they lived that recently?

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) Which language?

A: Similar to Basque.
Q: (Andromeda) But the giants lived alongside little people then?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And was life easier for normal people then, as well?

A: Yes

Q: (L) It had probably been in decline beginning from even earlier periods...

A: Yes

Q: (L) So that was the last big change I guess, something like 540 AD.

(Joe) In the reports of explorers after the Roman Empire going and finding giants and stuff, if they fought with the giants it seems they were relatively easily defeated as they were big and slow.

(L) They probably weren't able to deal with the environmental conditions.

(Andromeda) Were they stupid?

A: Not at first.

Q: (L) But they became stupid as their health declined in the environmental changes?

A: Yes
Looked at the linked website. What is the source of this information she is sharing?
This is channeled information. Ie. A human today undergoes some process wherein they essentially become the voice box of another conscious intelligence. The precaution I always take when dealing with this material is the uncertainty of the sources’ intentions:
  • - are they tricking people with narratives of false knowledge just to occupy time and benefit from the channeler’s energy
  • - are they themselves in a dimension that might be variant of our own
  • - is the channeler faking the authenticity of the experience for what ever agenda of their making
as I understand it, there are certain conscious levels where time and space behavior differently. We are typically constrained by time, but space is more apparent. Imagine if it was the reverse, you freely could move through time pace was was conditional.

Channeled beings are typically in this condition. They are channelable because you create within your body the proper resonant condition (space) for them to occur (like a tuning fork). I personally feel this indirect way to information is not as safe, since it includes transmitting all the extra ‘mechanical’ nervous impulses to speak which may do harm to the vessel (certainly it will continued for a long time).

likewise beings who are able to communicate in this manner can be either benevolent, insidious, or neutral. It’s less likely a benevolent being would risk the link unless it was of utmost importance or if the coherence between channeler and channeled is a very very good match.

addressing the dialogue of this Cassiopeia person you shared. It think the speaker hasn’t stated what has already been known for the most part from many different sources. So the novelty factor isn’t very peculiar. Also remember that a being will typically use the language and diction known to the listener (this is called distortion, ie. The stuff about Roman and such may be the nearest image or idea in the channelers mind, but it’s not necessary the truth—it’s the nearest effective ‘distortion’)

The part about the change in the world makes sense if there was a major shift in earths configuration, the changes in pressure would be comparable (but perhaps at different magnitudes) to what we are experienced now with widespread use of the microwave frequency.
First of all; I'm by this extended account of happenings that you have written!

ΙΧΘΥΣ (fish) and the fish sign is the godess of fertility Athargatis

The wheel is obvious taken from the pagan Wheel

The wheel represents the eternity (I am beginning and end, alfa and omega) because it never stops: every year the crops grow again, the lambs and chickens (easter lambs and eggs) get born, food is abundant in summer, then we harvest, time of no grow and to contemplate (winter) remember the lost ones (Halloween) and at the winter solstice ("birth of Jesus Lamb of god") the Sun wil come back and it will all begin again, in the early spring they turn the soil for the seeds (carnaval, when the world is upside down and the rich landowners are the peasants and the peasants are in charge and everything in the soil is still hidden - masks) and we have to wait for the crops (fasting periode after carnaval) and everything will grow again and so the wheel of the earth spins.

So yes, the fertility godess is very important in this one, and still in many countries in Europe they perform fertility rites.

I found this Photo
And I was like wait... What? Who?
Why would a 400AD guy hide in Constantinopel for non-existent Russians?
And I found a few other things.
First of all Ieso Christo.

I found this Guy
who made a study of Roman writings +/- 300AD

This is supposed to be the founding of Constantinopel named after himself in Latin:

Nam Constantinus proprii cum conderet urbem nominis et primus Romano in nomine regum christicolam gereret, divinum mente recepit consilium, ut quoniam Romanae moenibus urbis,aemula magnificis strueret tunc moenia coeptis,his quoque Romuleam sequeretur dotibus urbem,ut sua apostolicis muniret moenia laetus corporibus.

My Google translate says Christicolam gereret as :
"Christ worshippers"
but if I divide all the words it comes to
Christ Atoined one
Colam : "likewise"
Gereret: "campaign "

I do notice the lack of capital letters for Christ too.

I translate it as: I establish the city of Constantinopel like the followers of the same atoined ones.

I'm wandering here from the official translation.

When I Google or translate Ieso ("Jesus')
I get to:
Translated as: *Teaching authority
* Jesuits. Established 1534 as a branch of the Roman catholic church.

We all know (i hope?) how the catholic church adapted the pagan religion and shoveled into a sort of Christianity with easter, birth of Jesus etc. because they were otherwise seen as pagans? During reformation?

Jesuits and how they tried to stir Europe are a story apart but everytime I see this 500 / j500 /i500 similarities.

And what a coincidence:
Reformation, Calvin, religious wars, the whole shabang begun around i500 / j500
And even more: America was "discovered" just before that.

Ok, so they (the new Americans?) sent us Napoleon, Hitler, they bombed our ages old trading and Hanze cities, libraries, churches, Dresden and now they are even not bothered to shoot an airplane with people out of the air and blame Russia for It

Did they also send the war on religion ?

Here in Europe they say that TPB want Europe in a constant war and instability. For whatever reason.
Money I guess?

I do think that Peter the great did exist.
But this Nicolaas Witsen drew already a
for him when he was not even tsar yet, according to the official story he was then just 15 years old.
So eiter they are shoveling false history into his account or something else is going on.

I was really surprised that tsar Nicholas opened the Peace Palace in the Hague.

Off course the story got mingled and now all the credits go to America and mr Carnegie and according to the Wikipedia the Russia gave us a .... Vase. Yes. A Vase

On the official Dutch site
there is more information.
I will not elaborate too much about the strange history of this Palace, but there are discrepancies.

Why am I so insisting on the Dutch- Russian relationship?
Because it was huge and ages old, it was something with Hanze cities and it brought wealth and people liked the Russians.
And they shovel it under the carpet.
And I think it is the key why the history of Europe had to be demolished.
Big time.
Because Russia ruled.

In the 1650's (or j650) they built the Dam Palace for vague reasons
and it looks pretty Russian I think.

Perhaps the story is not:
Peter the great built St Petersburg as a mirror of Amsterdam but:
Amsterdam was created in the image of St Petersburg.
What was already there, or at least the knowledge how to build advanced cities like st Petersburg was there.

Because the whole city of Amsterdam is documented but most of it is only from 1600-1700 or so.
So they assume that the Canal Houses were constructed around 1600 because documents go so far.
But to me it seems as if they were already there and people just bought them.

I have this old book about Amsterdam and it says:

"Already since the 12th century or so Amsterdam is famous for its trade (I always wonder how? And with whom? Since Holland was one big empty swamp?And why Amsterdam in the swamp?) and suddenly there was absolute silence, nobody wrote about Amsterdam anymore up until the 17t century"

Amsterdam used to be a star fort too. It's buried.
They say its mostly demolished but I don't think so.
History had to be rewritten in a quite neutral place I guess?
That's why we got Scaliger and co.
'the scaler'

They probably just stole him from the roman Empire and placed him in Leiden to write books.
That's why he wrote in Latin instead of Dutch.
Also the alleged founding "fathers" of America the Pilgrims came from Leiden.
It's all just too much coincidence.

The USA created themselve as the new Empire over Europe and Russia and the world and all had to be destroyed.
They sent the communists and killed the tsar, they sent Hitler and Stalin.

I am not sure how other Europeans feel but I feel bothered by the agressive 'dictatorship' that USA puts on us.
Off course our state propaganda tells us otherwise.

They destabilize the whole European continent with creating all these wars and (muslim) refugees that overflow Europe and they keep the whole continent of Africa poor, they push agressive trading agreements in their favor and force embargo's with countrys that ar out of American favor, they force us to withdraw from Russian gas and our own gas supply is running out, so now our nice country gets filled with these terrible and ugly windmills and they demolish ages old forests for the so called sustainable "biomassa centrales" and I heard in Germany it is not much better.

The big money elite (black rock etc) demolish our small companies, they buy all the houses and real estates and rent them for high prices and push us into a shallow Netflix and McDonald's kind of society, they demolish our pensionfunds and banking systeem so people think are smart and invest their money into ETF's owned by those American investment elite and they call it all
"Zzzze great reset".

I think this idea already started with the "world fairs".
The reset for a consumer profit world for a few rich instead of a sustainable world.

The world power of USA is declining because they seemed to have overlooked the Chinese and perhaps they are already building a proxy army of orks (or giants?) in Antarctica and bombard us now with aliens and UFO's because then we will believe it is an alien invasion.
And the Americans will conquer these, off course.

I think the dark ages did not exist, they made up munbo jumbo; we all had to worship in the j500 the new American

G Gold
O Oil
D Dollars

Whatever there was in the form of (free?) energy, they created a new form of slavery in the form of the American GOD and the hunger for GOD with all these "new" inventions like cars and airplanes and central heating and light bulbs and amusement parks.

Perhaps everything in the previous European and maybe even in previous American empire things were almost free and people lived happy and in prosperity because suddenly (when did it start?) they invented owning property and state loans and banks and all.

Maybe they even raided children from the old world, like Russia, Poland, Germany and placed them in USA (like the orphan trains). Maybe the Russian cities were so empty because their people were just stolen from it. And perhaps they stole their knowledge too.

According to my 1800's book about Russia and the Netherlands everybody liked the Russians.
They were nice open minded people with religious freedom and friendly trading skills.
Not at all that bunch of backwards people that they say they were.

Basically everything that "Democratic" America say they are, but in reality they are not, were the Russians.

And off course I don't mean random Americans but the elite.

And no, I don't think there was a particular "Jesus event" exept maybe that America was discovered and suddenly things happend in Europe.
I even go so far that Jesus is the false flag.

Perhaps an event has taken place but at the same time j500 the establishment of the earthy living Jesus and the reformation and enlightment (to get rid of magic beliefs) people now will not buy it. They need science. We now live in the era of science.
Whatever that is.
You have given us a lot to process. And I do want to come back to this later BUT right now I just want to tell you that the same crap that you pointed out happening to Europeans and Russians by the "Elite" is also happening to average Americans. I am referring to the Blackrock comment. I live in middle and my friends and family have been talking about this "making everyone renters" move that is happening. I have known for the majority of my life that whomever is in control of this world is not anyone we can see. What is so alarming is how desperate their actions are...with each successive president, it is like the PTB are telling the world --"can we be more obvious that the POTUS does not run the country or anything else for that matter.
So- my point is- we need to be pointing at the hidden controllers- not necessarily the "Americans". We lost our country years ago...if we ever had it in the first place.
And I think the Israëli's know that if there is a cataclysm not even Rockefeller or JP Morgan, Elon Musk of Bill Gates can save them, that's why they sent Wikipedia to the moon.
Huh, my previous post got lost.
I want to help diagnose and explain the cause of the excessive fear I’m seeing interconnected with these topics of missing history. My aim is to bring some ease of mind hopefully. After watching the most recent movie shnet posted on their forms ( second movie ), I can help but feel a large portion of this audience has really allowed fear to become to much of a lens through which their thoughts are communicated.

Firstly I want to say the global shift in the economic paradigm from Western Markets to Global ones is connected to the the shift of the traditional ideal of the honest American Business to those industries today which use every available expedient at the expense of the customers but the gain of their pocketbooks. Fear is the most powerful motivator, so most contemporary businesses that target wide audiences take full advantage of this fact. News stations, hospitals, insurance companies, consumed goods etc. all are typically businesses operated for the convenience of the employees over that of their customers, and use every means possible for emotionally grasping and retaining their customer or attention. In today’s market, attention can often scale on value moreso than monetary value, since attention can merit influence—influence that money can’t always afford in all scenarios.

So what I’m identifying here is that our ‘consumer culture’ which displaced many traditional aspects of society, like religions, locality/insulated community, and honest ethical business—is a major source of the root of this fear. However it’s really not trying to be bad or evil. Have you ever hear the idea that you never see a Ferrari commercial since the people who buy Ferraris aren’t sitting on their ass watching tv? Basically the point I want to make is the fear conditioning is a problem if you allow yourself to become conditioned. Sure, it can seem like we are born into it now, and we’re navigating a world of pitfalls and traps, but that’s sorta inevitable, it’s a growing pains more than anything as disparate cultures from across many landscapes are now seamlessly mixing again at incredible rates. Traditionally in the east, it’s almost expected that if you stop and ask for directions you will be intentionally misguided so that you learn the lesson of building self reliance and strengthen your curiosity/awareness to the solution in your environment (having gone to China in 2019, I can personally attest it is still this way). This ideal spread alongside with Buddhism at it merged with most eastern cultures and its predominance is the reason why the contemporary business world has no qualms with framing ‘manipulating business practices’ as ‘clever expedience to gain an edge on the competition’.

That point establish, I will now establish the other approach to my argument. The nature of unstable or ill-moraled peoples is to die out and be lost moreso to continue through time and guide the cultural memory. On the other hand the ethical and morally sound culture have a much longer life span, influence, and power in the world theatre. It seems like there are many terrible powers to be, because there are—however this is always true. What isn’t true is that they (the poor in spirit) are the force which shapes our experiences and life conditions, they have no real power on the illusion of power. The ill-minded are always in that means to and end role, guided and instructed by people and forces which have a much sounder grasp on rule. Bad rulers do not last long, and what we perceive as harsh rule is really just the complexity and conundrums of having to find solutions in the worlds current state of affairs (triage perspective). If we say that technology is very powerful but also that constraining it is a necessary action to maintain a greater playing field then much of the post-modern developments make a lot of sense. The emergence of entertainment in the American market is a de facto point of evidence for a major effort towards providing more accessible ways to seek meaning (this will sound shallow but in the context of population growth plus international cities, traditional methods like religions cause more strife than peace amid many different cultures mixing together, on the other hand any mixture of cultures can appreciate and understand entertainment in a communal way).

Basically my point is the post modern solutions aren’t perfect but they are in my opinion a second attempt. The first attempt was the deployment of perfect machines and energy in the foundry period, and its failure didn’t take in account the life and death cycle that is a condition of this realm. I think ultimately this first attempt didn’t leave room for renewal or the possibility for mixing the old with the new, and so it was to sterile or rigid for bridging the gaps between cultures, it was like trying to hammer in the screw. It left to many without opportunities since not much needed to be rebuild after years and consumption cycles for energy wouldn’t have facilitated a regular circulation of money.

On the notion of stolen history, I think much of what we see today was generated history. History that was created out of the pattern of meaningful histories, so the ideas could continue to breathe be it in different names (get over the attachment to historic egos). I think a collection of intelligent and ultimately morally ethical people were responsible for creating histories for various nationalities across the world. I think just as there is no hero with no villain, there will always be that necessary evil—but I don’t subscribe to them being the source of the ideas and adaptions of history. In light of a world that may bring naturally occurring disasters that completely obliterate an entire culture; to seed a newfound population with a rich sense of identity, meaning, and history is a mercy and a painstaking charity—not a devious act to manipulate. The stories that are possibly closer to the source are found not in history books, but in the mytho-poetic prose and narratives of antiquated religions and wisdom teachings; they contain information structures far beyond anything modern education can even phases or adopt quickly enough. I think it’s very likely that these continued traditions which have outlived many terrible nations and empires are also the source of many developed histories as I previously described. I believe we are now in a strange time we’re our ideas and language are slowly digesting and converting the necessary components to upholster an internationally integrated world culture, and what we are seeing is a development from the lowest denominator first (to accommodate population expansion) to then eventually regaining and adapting into modern tongue and practice the same wisdoms of old to a more broad audience who seek after it.
In a way, I'm a pagan. And the magnetic poles are shifting.
But isn't Christianity really an offshoot of paganism if you really think about it? From holidays to the pragmatic beliefs. We know that Halloween, Easter, Christmas and others were taken from pagan beliefs in the first place. Eoster, spring solstice, Samhain Halloween, Saturnalia for Christmas, all of these have roots in pagan belief. Maybe it's just the twisted Roman Catholicism that is to blame for most everything. Sorry, late night thought, too many similarities between so many things, that or maybe I just read too much lol.
So what is Today's date?
In all of our lifetimes, speaking to KD and the readers of this Blog, we have been told we are in the age of Pisces. However, all the maps anyone has ever seen has the "Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn". Those belong to the Age of Aries, which was over 2000 years ago- we are told.
(Credit for pointing this out goes to YT channel FlatFact).
Here is how I understand it: in reference to navigating by the stars, if you are at the equator on March 21st (at noon to be precise) the constellation that the sun is in tells us what age we are in. But the Maps don't say that-- they just indicate the "Equator" . However, If you are 23.5 degrees north of the Equator on December 21st and 23.5 degrees south of the equator on June 21st - where the sun is also indicates what age you are in, by association. In the age of Aries, the corresponding equinox is Libra, the December solstice is Capricorn and the June solstice is Cancer.
Supposedly, we have been in the age of Pisces for the last 2000 years. The corresponding Equinox is Virgo, and the 2 solstices are in Sagittarius and Gemini. So the maps form the last 2000 years should say Tropic of Sagittarius and Tropic of Gemini.
Now we are supposedly moving into the age of Aquarius. A few weeks ago on June 21st, I used Stellarium, I said my location was Cuba, and what do you know? The sun was in Taurus- which is where it should be at that location and time for the Age of Aquarius. So I am assuming that sailors have seen Sagittarius and Gemini at those locations and times during the past 2000 years and just made a mental adjustment when looking at navigational maps.

Question: Is it that the maps are wrong and/or faked? Are we missing some crucial piece of information that would make this make sense?
After watching the most recent movie shnet posted on their forms ( second movie ), I can help but feel a large portion of this audience has really allowed fear to become to much of a lens through which their thoughts are communicated.
I haven't watched it; for (I have learned) the prevailing point of view is not one of awe, wonder, and, yes, humor but fear-- as you note. Maybe justifiable - but inflexible and, therefore, pointless.
Have you ever hear the idea that you never see a Ferrari commercial since the people who buy Ferraris aren’t sitting on their ass watching tv?
This is a good question. (Pardon my judgment). Ordinary "folks" who do watch TV can't understand the difference between the real and the imagined. As a result real accomplishments are written off as luck or otherwise inserted into some kind of mythical narrative-- "appropriate" to the situation, of course. But can you blame them? They are predisposed to buy high and sell low.
That point establish, I will now establish the other approach to my argument. The nature of unstable or ill-moraled peoples is to die out and be lost moreso to continue through time and guide the cultural memory.
Helped along by certain experimental concoctions.
Basically my point is the post modern solutions aren’t perfect but they are in my opinion a second attempt. The first attempt was the deployment of perfect machines and energy in the foundry period, and its failure didn’t take in account the life and death cycle that is a condition of this realm.
Begs the question: Who exactly set this up so nicely?