Today's Date
"I can’t tell you exactly what year it is because we honestly don’t know," said Morpheus in The Matrix. Well, may be we don't know what year it is today, but there clearly are some people out there, who know that we do not know. We have at least two such individuals:
Heck, may be they don't know that we do not know either. But in this case they know some individuals who told them that we do not know...

I have seen enough pieces to form a concept in my head, but putting it into words supported by relevant images... it's gonna take a few days. This is definitely not what I'd prefer to write about, but I can't ignore the observed.
  • Our Hungarian, Russian (and other European) readers might find the below article quite entertaining and disturbing.
For me, it all started with the below 1591 excerpt.
  • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Beala.
    • It took the origin from the Kings of Hungary.
  • Do you see any house of Beala in the official narrative?
  • Here is what we should have had in the below excerpt:
    • The surname of the imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids.
    • The Rurik line ruled from 862 until 1610.
KD: This Beala vs Rurikids issue appears to be a humongous historical red flag.
  • It's a teaser. Links are gonna be down below when we get to the issue.

Historical Lies
That said, I believe that the above "quoted" book is merely a reflection of the historical narrative they had in 1590s. Fortunately for us, it is much harder to lie when your contemporaries are still alive. In 1591, their current historical narrative could be altered only so much.
  • From this perspective, in 1591, they simply could not say "the Imperial house of Russia is called Rurikids", because at the time when the book was published, that simply was not the case.
  • On a separate note, even as far back as 1591 is supposed to be on the time line, they already did not really know their history, imho. We have some amazing research tools & resources at our fingertips these days. They did not.
We all have our opinions, and in my opinion, we live in a jar of historical lies labeled "TRUTH". Our society has been marinating in this jar for so long, that lies ended up becoming our reality. I doubt that the label will ever change.
Chronology #1
I do understand that there are those, who fundamentally disagree with Fomenko's findings. To disagree, one would have to verify his calculations, and point out where this Ph. D. in mathematics was wrong.
  • As it stands, according to Fomenko, Jesus was born in 1152 AD.
    • That would be 2021 - 1152 = 869 years ago.
  • I came to think, that Jesus was not a living being, but rather an event, from which we chose to count our years.
Here are additional reasons to consider that Jesus was an Event and not a Living Being:
May be further research into the Zodiac Circle could help us to determine what four major events were supposed to signify.
  • The conceiving of Jesus by Virgin Mary.
  • The birth of Jesus.
    • Sagittarius is a centaur, but the key aspect (imho) is the arrow (or spear), suggesting an attack.
      • ♐
    • Considering that the assumed year of his birth is between 6 and 4 BC, we should be asking questions in reference to the AD/BC split.
  • The death of Jesus.
    • Aries is Latin for "ram".
      • ♈
    • Wasn't Jesus the Lamb of God?
  • The Resurrection of Jesus.
    • How do we go from Aries (Sacrificial Lamb) to Pisces (Fishes) in 3 days.
      • I have no idea...
    • Pisces is the twelfth and final astrological sign in the Zodiac.
      • ♓
    • It spans 330° to 360° of celestial longitude.
The resurrection of Jesus, or anastasis, is the Christian belief that God raised Jesus on the third day after his crucifixion.
  • For the Christian tradition, the bodily resurrection was the restoration to life of a transformed body powered by spirit, as described by Paul and the Gospel authors, that led to the establishment of Christianity.
  • They conclude that Jesus was most likely crucified on April 3, AD 33.
Jesus vs. Fish
One way or another, but Jesus became associated with fish. There are a few theories out there on how this Jesus-Fish connection might have originated. The entire thing even got its own name: Ichthys.
  • The ichthys is a symbol consisting of two intersecting arcs, the ends of the right side extending beyond the meeting point so as to resemble the profile of a fish.
  • The symbol was adopted by early Christians as a secret symbol.
  • It is now known colloquially as the "sign of the fish" or the "Jesus fish".

This here is claimed to be one of the earliest circular ichthys symbols, created by combining the Greek letters ΙΧΘΥΣ.


We sure have an explanation, where every single letter in ΙΧΘΥΣ is explained. Somehow, I doubt that we get the intended meaning though.
  • How do we know that this is not some date from I, from IX or of/from "pisces"?
    • ... the numeric values of the letters are added together to obtain the total.​
    • For example, 241 was represented as ΣΜA (200 + 40 + 1).
    • It was not always the case that the numbers ran from highest to lowest: a 4th-century BC inscription at Athens placed the units to the left of the tens.
  • How do we know it's not some Bible verse?
  • What's up with the wheel? Could it be the Ezekiel's Wheel +1?
    • Who knows, may be the IX monogram is somehow related to this wheel...

Ichthyo is a combining form meaning “fish,” used in the formation of compound words. For example - ichthyology. For myself, I see an obscured reference to water, as in ... may be "we are all fish in the water"... just speculating.

I am Alpha and Omega
In the New Testament Book of Revelation, God says, “I am Alpha and Omega,” meaning that he is the beginning and end of all things. In the Greek alphabet, alpha is the first letter and omega is the last.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
  • Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.
  • And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

Well, May be Jesus was the beginning for some, but he sure was the end for others. I think what we have hiding behind this words is this:
  • Jesus Event = Apocalypse
The Bible
In my opinion, there are no predictions in the Bible, because it was written after certain events took place. The narrative can claim whatever they want to. Facts speak for themselves. The great uncial codices or four great uncials are the only remaining uncial codices that contain (or originally contained) the entire text of the Bible.
  • Codex Vaticanus– c. 325–350
    • The Codex is named after its place of conservation in the Vatican Library, where it has been kept since at least the 15th century.
  • Codex Sinaiticus– c. 330–360
    • discovered in 1844
  • Codex Alexandrinus– c. 400–440
    • It derives its name from Alexandria where it resided for a number of years.
    • Then it was given to Charles I of England in the 17th century.
  • Codex Ephraemi– c. 450
    • Go figure. My guess it was "discovered" some time in the 19th century.
When we take "dated" out of the equation, the oldest copy of the Bible text source is no older than generous 1400s. There are no prophets. There are those who know, and those who do not, imho.

Historical Sources
Reading between the lines of the existing historical lies is the best source of truth we have, imho. Just like I mentioned in the beginning of this article, it was harder to lie about some 1627 AD in 1627 AD than it is in 2021 AD. Seeking out details extracted from those 1627 AD lies could point us towards some of the (more or less) truthful facts.


Historical sources include documents, artifacts, archaeological sites, features, oral transmissions, stone inscriptions, paintings, recorded sounds, images (photographs, motion picture), and oral history. Even ancient relics and ruins, broadly speaking, are historical sources.
Those, who genuinely tried to figure out the sources of our alleged knowledge of the events of the past know that:
Manuscript Forgery
It appears that our historical narrative has a hidden, or rather unadvertised pandemic. The amount of made up documents is truly astounding. There is no possible way to determine where the lies end and the truth begins.

  • The Donation of Constantine is a forged Roman imperial decree by which the 4th-century emperor Constantine the Great supposedly transferred authority over Rome and the western part of the Roman Empire to the Pope. Composed probably in the 8th century, it was used, especially in the 13th century, in support of claims of political authority by the papacy. In many of the existing manuscripts (handwritten copies of the document), including the oldest one, the document bears the title Constitutum domini Constantini imperatoris.
  • William Henry Ireland (1775-1835) and John Payne Collier (1789-1883) are two of the most well-known forgers of early modern documents. While Ireland focused almost exclusively on Shakespeare forgeries, Collier was more broad-reaching in his fakes.
  • Forgery was rife in the medieval era, with some of Europe’s leading holy men cooking up reams of counterfeit documents. As modern scholars have established, over half of the surviving texts in the names of the Merovingian rulers of early medieval France and Germany (c481–752) are fakes; a third of those in the names of the Lombard rulers of northern Italy (568–774) are suspect; and similar figures hold true of the nearly 2,000 documents of pre-Conquest England.
  • A new book claims that England’s Gospels of St Augustine and Ireland’s Book of Kells, among other famous medieval manuscripts, are fakes.
  • The Spanish Forger is the name given to an unidentified individual who, in the late 19th to early 20th century, created a large number of forgeries of medieval miniatures. The Spanish Forger's works were painted on vellum or parchment leaves of genuine medieval books, using either blank margins or scraping off the original writing. He also "completed" unfinished miniatures or added missing miniatures in medieval choir books. His works fooled many experts and collectors at the time and appear today in the collections of many museums and libraries. Over 200 forgeries have been identified.
  • In April 2015, about year and a half before the Beyond Words exhibition opened, I contacted some of its organisers to suggest that the illuminated manuscript in which this miniature is found should perhaps not be included in the exhibition.
  • Margaret M. Mitchell of the University of Chicago, together with experts in micro-chemical analysis and medieval bookmaking, has concluded that one of the University Library's most enigmatic possessions is a forgery.
  • Forgeries tell us much about any civilization. Look at what people are forging, and we will learn what matters to them most. Christians of the early Middle Ages were earnestly counterfeiting relics of saints, to create tangible evidence of supernatural beliefs which they longed to validate. In twelfth-century Europe, people fabricated land charters, inventing documentation of title to feudal property on which livelihoods and society depended. In the sixteenth century, it was commonplace to concoct spurious ancestors, faking up complex family trees for the ambitious, in a time when social ranking was a necessity for advancement.
Additional links covering various historical forgeries.
KD: As you can see, they've been forging everything... what's real out there? Nothing?

Industrial Progress
It appears that in our PTB provided understanding of the "linear" progress of humanity, we forgot what a beast critical thinking was. In reality, to get us out of the proverbial "technological" darkness, we only needed two people, Tesla and Trouvé:
Considering that we were also given two industrial revolutions, it somehow ended up not being at all suspicious that it only took us 156 years to go from a hot air balloon to a turbojet powered aircraft.
Welcome to the BS: While our ancestors have been around for about six million years, the modern form of humans only evolved about 200,000 years ago. Civilization as we know it is only about 6,000 years old, and industrialization started in the earnest only in the 1800s.
  • In other words, for approximately 199,800 (99.9% of 200,000) years humans were idiots, while possessing the same brain.
    • Early Homo sapiens had brains within the range of people today, averaging 1,200 ml or more.
Chronology #2
If you want to learn all the BS about AD and BC, here is your link. For us, it's important to recognize that there is a split there indicating "before" and "after". "Before" is a totally separate topic I will touch up on later. "After", or Anno Domini, aka AD, is something we do need to cover:
  • The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin and means "in the year of the Lord", but is often presented using "our Lord" instead of "the Lord", taken from the full original phrase "anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ".
  • Where is Jesus Christ hiding in "Anno Domini"?
Let's take a look at the Second Epistle of Peter 3:10:
  • But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
  • KJV Source
Then we have these calculations performed by biblical scholars of the past.
  • Year 437 AD - the precise Year from whence the Lord of Times and Seasons thought good to date the beginning of his Times, or Reign.
Questions: Is the "Year of the Lord" and "Anno Domini" even the same thing?
  • Judgement by fire is indicative of the Apocalypse times.
  • If this is when the "Day of the Lord" comes, and we count from the "Year of the Lord", wouldn't it mean that the Apocalypse has already happened?

My Understanding of the Time Line
I do not see how we can figure out what year we live in. The entire BC/AD split appears to be highly questionable by now. The mere fact that our ancestors, for whatever reason, decided to count their years from a certain "Jesus Birth Event" (that allegedly happened four to six years prior to the BC/AD split) sounds somewhat suspicions. Unfortunately, we are way too used to this "Anno Domini" by now.
  • Here is my vision of the time line.
  • I do not insist on the specific dates. At the same time, in order to put things on a time line, we do need chronological points of reference.

Considering that the most powerful ruler of the Hunnic Empire was Attila the Hun, it only makes sense to start with the country of Hungary. Today it's a tiny landlocked country in Central Europe. Some will argue that Attila the Hun had anything to do with Hungary as a country:
  • Attila was Hun, not Hungarian. Only the English name of the magyarok (the Hungarians) make this notion sound plausible, but in fact Attila lived earlier in present day Hungary before the arrival the Hungarians to the Carpathian basin.
  • Source
The issue appears to be way more sophisticated, and it just may be, that Attila the Hun ended up influencing many countries, Hungary included.


Tobolsk is a town in Russia, located at the confluence of the Tobol and Irtysh rivers. Founded in 1590, Tobolsk is the second-oldest Russian settlement east of the Ural Mountains in Asian Russia, and is a historic capital of the Siberia region.

Why are we talking about the city of Tobolsk? Here is why.

Is there any supporting evidence of the Hunnic Empire occupying Siberian lands? Some people think that there might be some.
Time frames provided on the image below are obviously narrative compliant ones.


The above "Point #1" is right about where the city of Tobolsk is. What else do we know about the city of Tobolsk?

On the below map, we can see where Sibir (10 miles from Tobolks), the capital of Tartars used to be at.


We know that Attila made it to right about here. If he really did hang out somewhere in the vicinity of Sibir/Tobolsk, than his empire was a bit bigger than we were told.


This is probably an appropriate moment to introduce Noah into the picture.


Translated by @Silveryou in here: ...roughly "Here Noah, prince of the Tartars and imperator (in the litteral sense of highest commander/general) of 600 armed men (not completely sure about the word preceding 600, therefore the meaning could be different), commands and moves (in the sense that this is his territory)"
  • edit: not "imperator" but "imperat", therefore he "commands upon" and not "the imperator of"... maybe
Noah is also present on plate 3 of the below 1516 Map.
  • Lat: Hic dominatur et ambulat contra persos Noy princeps tartarorum et imperator super sexingenta [milia added by hand] armatorum virorum qui omnes prouincias tam Cristianorum quam Saracenorum a capite persie usque ad Syriam sue ditioni subiungavat.
  • Eng: Here rules and marches against the Persians Noah, prince of the Tartars and commander of 60,000 soldiers who has brought under his control all of the countries, both Christian and Saracen, from the top of Persia to Syria.
  • Noah (lived 600 years before the Flood, and 350 after the Flood)

On the plate 3, we also have Batu Khan:
  • Lat: Hic ambulat et dominatur Bathot Magni imperatoris Cham princeps maximus de Casana et imperator super sexingenta [sic] .m. armatorum virorum tam christianorum quam Saracenorum qui cum exercitu suo tempore Estiuali super ripam fluminis ad montes ascendit, tempero uero hyemali ad mare descendit.
  • Eng: Here Batu lives as a nomad and rules, the greatest prince of Casana [and descendant] of the great emperor Chan, and commander of sixty thousand soldiers, both Christians and Saracens, who with his army ascends over the riverbank to the mountains in the summer, but in the winter descends to the sea.
  • Batu Khan (c. 1205–1255)
    • Batu or Baatu, better known today as Batu Khan of the Golden Horde, was son of Jochi, and thus a grandson of Genghis Khan.

On plate 4 of the same 1516 Map we can see Gog Khan.
  • Lat: Magnus Tartarum Gog Chaam Rex regum et dominus dominantium.
  • Eng: The great Tartar Gog Khan, king of kings and lord of lords.
  • Question: Who was Gog Khan (or Hun)
Gog Khan.jpg

Note: Translation for the above 1516 map was obtained here. Not surprisingly, they claim that Noy does not mean Noah.

Noah's Family Tree

The below info was dismissed by the narrative compilers as total BS, which means we could be on the right track. Sources are:

The below passage suggests that Ninus was Nimrod's grandson. We may, or may not need this detail later.


That's a big a*s empire I've never heard of... what about you?



I don't know if any of the above was of any assistance leading the reader to Attila the Hun, but there you go.



This "empire fell apart" story reminded me of the Alexander the Great narrative.
  • Additionally, there is a situation, where we have approximately 2300-2500 year gap between Nimrod and Attila. Chances are, this is how devious historical lies are.
  • I did not try to track down two sons of Attila, neither did I try to figure out which one of the Nimrod's nephews could be Attila. This article is getting long as it is, and I'm not even close to being done.
Hun = Khan?
I think we were fed a bunch of phantom empires here, where the Hunnic Empire and the Golden Horde Empire are one and the same. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few other "empires" would fall into the same "phantom" category. Let's take a look...

The Hunnic Empire (370 AD - 459 AD): ~ 89 years
  • No one knows exactly where the Huns came from.
  • Some scholars believe they originated from the nomad Xiongnu people.
  • Other historians believe the Huns originated from Kazakhstan, or elsewhere in Asia.
  • Prior to the 4th century, the Huns traveled in small groups led by chieftains and had no known individual king or leader.
  • They arrived in southeastern Europe around 370 A.D. and conquered one territory after another for over 70 years.
  • By 459, the Hun Empire had collapsed, and many Huns assimilated into the civilizations they’d once dominated.
  • Source
This is like pretty BS: came from nowhere, and disappeared into nowhere.
  • This is like super convenient for them controllers, "No Body, No Crime".
Let's take a look at a narrative compliant map of the Hunnic Empire.


Empire of Alexander the Great (336 BC - 323 BC): ~13 years
  • He succeeded his father King Philip II to the throne at the age of 20 .
  • By the age of thirty, he had created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to northwestern India.
  • He was undefeated in battle and is widely considered to be one of history's most successful military commanders.
  • Several factors caused the sudden collapse of the Empire that Alexander built. These include:
    • the early and the somewhat unexpected death of the great king,
    • absence of a capable successor,
    • rebellious generals,
    • the size of the territories Alexander had invaded
Sounds like a military fairy tale with an end similar to that of the Hunnic Empire. It's almost like Alexander knew not to invade areas the Hunnic Empire was gonna invade 700 years later.


The Golden Horde (1242 AD – 1502 AD): ~260 years
  • The Golden Horde was originally a Mongol and later Turkicized khanate established in the 13th century and originating as the northwestern sector of the Mongol Empire.
    • At his death in 1227, Genghis Khan divided the Mongol Empire amongst his four sons as appanages, but the Empire remained united under the supreme khan.
  • With the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire after 1259 it became a functionally separate khanate.
  • You'd have to read the narrative, because it's rather creative.
The size is deceiving, because the Golden Horde was a part of a much bigger Mongol Empire.


The Mongol Empire (1206–1368): ~162 years
  • The Mongol Empire of the 13th and 14th centuries was the largest contiguous land empire in history and the second largest empire by landmass, second only to the British Empire.
  • The Mongol Empire emerged from the unification of several nomadic tribes in the Mongol homeland under the leadership of Genghis Khan (c. 1162–1227), whom a council proclaimed as the ruler of all Mongols in 1206.
  • The empire began to split due to wars over succession, as the grandchildren of Genghis Khan disputed whether the royal line should follow from his son and initial heir Ögedei or from one of his other sons, such as Tolui, Chagatai, or Jochi.
  • Source

The Ottoman Empire (1299–1922): ~623
  • At its peak in the 1500s, the Ottoman Empire was one of the biggest military and economic powers in the world.
  • The empire controlled its territory with a powerful military, lucrative commerce, and impressive achievements in fields ranging from architecture to astronomy.
  • But it didn’t last. Though the Ottoman Empire persisted for 600 years, it succumbed to what most historians describe as a long, slow decline, despite efforts to modernize.
  • What caused the once awe-inspiring Ottoman Empire collapse? Historians aren’t in complete agreement.

The Timurid Empire (1370-1507): ~137
  • The empire was founded by Timur (also known as Tamerlane), who established the empire between 1370 and his death in 1405.
  • He envisioned himself as the great restorer of the Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan, regarded himself as Genghis's heir.
  • The power of Timurids declined rapidly during the second half of the 15th century, largely due to the Timurid tradition of partitioning the empire.
  • By 1500, the divided and wartorn Timurid Empire had lost control of most of its territory.

An Opinion: I think the below map is indictive of a common denominator. Whether Tartary, Scythia, or whatever other name it might have had.

1754 Map


We can picture it this way too... may be.


East vs. West
- everything most likely comes down to this -
  • I will try to elaborate on the maps portion of the article in the overall summary.

Rurik vs. Beala
I finally made it to what I actually wanted to talk about. So, we have this issue, where we are faced with an example of a major historical inconsistency. Here is what we have in every contemporary textbook:
  • Russia has no history prior to 862 AD. The ancestors of modern Russians are the Slavic tribes, whose original home is thought by some scholars to have been the wooded areas of the Pinsk Marshes, one of the largest wetlands in Europe.
  • The rest of the BS mambo jumbo is see here.
Pinsk Marshes.jpg

The establishment of the first East Slavic states in the 9th century coincided with the arrival of Varangians, the Vikings who ventured along the waterways extending from the eastern Baltic to the Black and Caspian Seas.
  • According to the Primary Chronicle, a Varangian from the Rus' people, named Rurik, was elected ruler of Novgorod in 862.
This "Primary Chronicle" has the same issue all other pre-1400s documents do.
  • Tradition long regarded the original compilation as the work of a monk named Nestor (c. 1056 – c. 1114); hence scholars spoke of Nestor's Chronicle or of Nestor's manuscript.
    • His compilation has not survived.
  • Because the original of the chronicle as well as the earliest known copies are lost, it is difficult to establish the original content of the chronicle.
  • The two main sources for the chronicle's text as it is known presently are the Laurentian Codex and the Hypatian Codex.
  • The Laurentian Codex was compiled in what are today Russian lands by the Nizhegorod monk Laurentius for the Prince Dmitry Konstantinovich in 1377.
  • The Hypatian Codex dates to the 15th century. It was written in what are today Ukrainian lands and incorporates much information from the lost 12th-century Kievan Chronicle and 13th-century Galician-Volhynian Chronicle.
    • Galician Volhynian Chronicle was discovered in 1809 by the Russian historian and opinion writer Nikolay Karamzin as a final part of the 15th century Hypatian Codex.
    • Kievan Chronicle is known from a single copy in the 15th-century Hypatian Codex, where it is sandwiched between the Primary Chronicle and the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle.
These comic books do look cool though.


Conclusion: Rurik was the one who started an organized state. To a certain degree, he was the founder of Russia.
  • That is per the narrative.
The Narrative: The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor, which states that Chuds, Eastern Slavs, Merias, Veses, and Krivichs "drove the Varangians back beyond the sea, refused to pay them tribute, and set out to govern themselves".
  • Afterwards the tribes started fighting each other and decided to invite the Varangians, led by Rurik, to reestablish order.
  • Rurik came in 860–862 along with his brothers Sineus and Truvor and a large retinue.
Question: Where did the current narrative lose the fourth brother Variuus?


1591 Source

- The 4 -
I've been saying for a long time that in our field of research, patterns are everything. Every single book, no matter how old it is, was pre-printed or pre-written with an incorporated set of lies. In this case we have four individuals establishing or continuing countries and empires.

  • 1 - Assyrius
  • 2 - Medus
  • 3 - Moscus
  • 4 - Magog
  • 1 - Trubor
  • 2 - Rurico
  • 3 - Sinees
  • 4 - Variuus
  • 1 - Kio
  • 2 - Scieko
  • 3 - Choranus
  • 4 - Libeda
The Empire of Alexander the Great
The Mongol Empire
There gotta be more, methinks...
  • Four kingdoms of Daniel: The four kingdoms of Daniel are four kingdoms which, according to the Book of Daniel, precede the "end-times" and the "Kingdom of God".
The Rurik Issue
Let's see what various texts have to say in reference to what house or dynasty the Russian royalty used to belong to. We are supposed to see Rurik for the surname. Here is straight out of wikipedia. I've included Hungary, because this is how I got into this entire mess.

Now look at the image below. Ignore the "cruelty" portion. The PTB started orchestrating their narrative a very long time ago. Fortunately for us, at some point in time they could not switch last names because it would have been too obvious.
  • Who is Ivan Vasilyevich Beala?

From the book it is obvious that the ruler at hand is Ivan (the 4th) Vasilyevich Ririk aka Ivan the Terribe (1530-1584). That is per the current narrative.

Note: From here on Beala = Béla due to the way this name can also be spelled.


The only Turk of such significance out there (imho) is Mehmed the Conqueror (1432-1481)

Per the narrative, there are four kings named Bela in the House of Árpád.
Note: All four of these Béla's belong to the Arpad dynasty. Nowhere in the todays narrative do we see the Béla dynasty.


The Árpád Dynasty
The Árpáds were the ruling dynasty of the Principality of Hungary in the 9th and 10th centuries and of the Kingdom of Hungary from 1000 to 1301. The dynasty was named after Grand Prince Árpád who was the head of the Hungarian tribal federation during the conquest of the Carpathian Basin, c. 895.
  • It is also referred to as the Turul dynasty, but rarely.
  • Both the first Grand Prince of the Hungarians Álmos and the first king of Hungary Saint Stephen were members of the dynasty.
  • Seven members of the dynasty were canonized or beatified by the Roman Catholic Church;
    • therefore, since the 13th century the dynasty has often been referred to as the "Kindred of the Holy Kings".
    • Two Árpáds were recognized as Saints by the Eastern Orthodox Church.
  • The dynasty came to end in 1301 with the death of King Andrew III of Hungary, while the last member of the House of Árpád, Andrew's daughter, Blessed Elizabeth of Töss, died in 1336 or 1338.

The Turul Dynasty

As it says above, the Arpad Dynasty was also referred to as the Turul Dynasty. The Turul is a mythological bird of prey, mostly depicted as a hawk or falcon, in Turkish tradition and Hungarian traditions. It is a national symbol of Hungarians. The name "Turul" is probably based on bla-bla-bla...
I don't know how old our English language is, but this bird's name sure sounds like "To Rule". Anyways...


It is also said that the mythic bird, the Turul, is the original bird of the original Hungarians, the Magyars, who migrated out of the plains of Central Asia. The legend says that in 896 AD, the bird dropped its sword in what is now modern day Budapest, indicating to the Magyars that the area was to be their homeland.
Note: And how about them little coincidences...




Source - 1581 Source - 1664 Source

Toruk Makto
Apologies, could not help it. A Toruk Makto is a Na'vi individual who successfully manages to ride a great leonopteryx (Na'vi name: toruk). There had only been five Toruk Maktos prior to Jake Sully, and they are spoken of with great respect and honour.

Árpád (c. 845 - c. 907)
Árpád was the head of the confederation of the Magyar tribes at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. He might have been either the sacred ruler or kende of the Hungarians, or their military leader or gyula, although most details of his life are debated by historians, because different sources contain contradictory information.

  • Despite this, many Hungarians refer to him as the "founder of our country", and Árpád's preeminent role in the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin has been emphasized by some later chronicles.
  • The dynasty descending from Árpád ruled the Kingdom of Hungary until 1301.
Rurik (c. 830 - 879)
Rurik, according to the 12th-century Primary Chronicle, was a Varangian chieftain of the Rus' who in the year 862 gained control of Ladoga, and built Novgorod in the same year. This legendary figure was considered by later rulers to be the founder of the Rurik dynasty, which ruled the Kievan Rus' and its successor states, including the Kingdom of Ruthenia, the Principality of Tver, Grand Duchy of Vladimir, the Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Novgorod Republic and the Tsardom of Russia, until the 17th century.


  • The only information about Rurik is contained in the 12th-century Primary Chronicle written by one Nestor.
    • The credability of this "Primary" chronicle was covered above.
  • Source
The Rurik Dynasty
The Rurik dynasty, or Rurikids was a dynasty founded by the Varangian prince Rurik, who established himself in Novgorod around the year AD 862. The Rurikids were the ruling dynasty of Kievan Rus' before it was finally disintegrated in the mid-13th century, as well as the successor Rus' principalities and Rus' prince republics of Novgorod, Pskov, Vladimir-Suzdal, Ryazan, Smolensk, Galicia-Volhynia (after 1199), Chernigov, and the Grand Duchy of Moscow (from 1263).
  • The Romanovych branch of the dynasty ruled central and western Rus'. These territories were unified by Roman the Great and his son Danylo, who was later crowned king of Galicia–Volhynia.
    • This Roman the Great and Danilo (some Daniel?) are uber interesting. Anything "Roman" should be scrutinized, especially when on paper these "Romanovich" people have nothing to do with the dynasty of Romanoffs.
  • After the line's extinction, the kingdom was absorbed by Poland and Lithuania, and the title of its king eventually passed to the ruler of Austro-Hungary.
  • Continuous Rurikid sovereignty from the ninth century to the fourteenth represents part of Ukraine's historical process.
  • In Ukrainian historiography, Rus' civilization - sometimes called Ukraine-Rus' - is not considered to have ended in 1240, but merely to have shifted its centre slightly westward.
As a ruling dynasty, the Rurik dynasty held its own in some parts of Rus' for a total of twenty-one generations in male-line succession, from Rurik (died 879) to Feodor I of Russia (died 1598), a period of more than 700 years. They are one of Europe's oldest royal houses.

Ivan III of Russia

Ivan III Vasilyevich (1440 -1505), also known as Ivan the Great, was a Grand Prince of Moscow and Grand Prince of all Rus'. Ivan served as the co-ruler and regent for his blind father Vasily II from the mid-1450s before he officially ascended the throne in 1462.
  • He tripled the territory of his state, ended the dominance of the Mongols/Tatars over Russia, renovated the Moscow Kremlin, introduced a new legal codex and laid the foundations of the Russian state.
  • His 1480 victory over the Great Horde is cited as the restoration of Russian independence 240 years after the fall of Kiev to Mongols' invasion.
  • Ivan was the first Russian ruler to style himself "tsar", albeit not as an official title. Through marriage to Sofia Paleologue, he made the double-headed eagle Russia's coat of arms and adopted the idea of Moscow as Third Rome.
  • His 43-year reign was one of the longest in Russian history, second only to that of his grandson Ivan IV (The Terrible).
  • Ivan III of Russia - The Rurik Dynasty - (1440 -1505)
Important: If Ivan the 3rd really said this, it should turn the entire historical narrative of Russia upside down.
In semi-normal English: That their ancestors came not of the Russe nation, Ivan III Vasilyevich father to this Emperor - Vasily III (1479-1533) - would many times boast disdaining (as should seem) to have his progeny derived from the Russe blood. As namely to an Englishman his goldsmith, that have received bullion of him to make certain plate: whom the Emperor commanded to look well to his weight. For my Russes (said be) are thieves all. Whereat the workman looking upon the Emperor, began to smile.
  • The Emperor (Ivan III of Russia) being of quick concept, charged him to tell him what he smiled at.
  • If your Majesty will pardon me (quote the goldsmith) I will tell you.
  • Your highness said that Russes were all thieves, and forgot in the mean while that yourself was a Russe.
  • I thought so (quote the Emperor) but was deceived.
  • For I am no Russe, my ancestors were Germans, for so they account for the Hungarians to be part of the German nation, though they indeed come from the Huns, that invaded those countries and rested in those parts of Pannonia, now called Hungary.
The below excerpt could (probably) also explain why Russia was being run (for so long) by the Holstein-Gottorp Dynasty.

In simple terms... Ivan III of Russia stated that his ancestors were Huns.

Note: A particular attention should be paid to the "Blind" issue:

Which one of the Bela Kings was the blind one? This one was:
Conclusion: The name of the dynasty of Russian tsars aka czars comes from this Bela II of Hungary, This is what the above paragraph clearly states. It is also obvious that Huns were the ancestors of Ivan II of Russia, per his own claim.
Empires and Individuals
I do start to think that historical doubles, triples and possibly quadruples are probably more numerous than we could possibly imagine. I doubt that we have gazillions of different "never lost a battle" / "scourge of God" / same area covering people. I think we might a few multiplied into a "legion". In the end, we get thousands years of history. Thousands years of history we do not really have. Some of these doubles do not share the exact same biography, most are separated by hundreds and thousands of years, but all of them do contribute to the overall lies we are faced with.
  • Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” “My name is Legion,” he replied, “ for we are many."
For more info on historical doubles you should probably look up Mr. Fomenko. These are the most obvious ones I notices while compiling this article.
"Horned" ones were always serious conquerors and warriors:
Events fall into the same category:
Though Attila does throw somewhat of a monkey wrench into the framework. Why does he have the double-headed eagle (or Turul) there?



When did Attila become a Roman emperor?
  • Ten roundels with bust-length portraits of Roman Emperors, with Augustus on the top flanked by plants and fruits, and three rows of three roundels, each with the sitter's name on a small tablet below the image; illustration to Weigel's 'Sculptura historiarum et temporum memoratrix' (1679).
  • Source


Note: I think these are the prototypes for our historical doubles. Different Peter the Greats, Arpads, Bealas, Tamerlanes, Alexander the Greats and Ivan the Terribles were just phantom copies of the above presented individuals (or individuals similar to them).

Additional Links & Info:

KD Summary: To be honest, this stuff is beyond my ability to process information. I think I am able to grasp the concept. At the same time, to systemically analyze the situation we are in, that would probably require a faculty. Here are a few final points I'd like to make. These are just my thoughts:
  • I suspect a much shorter time line of the known history. I understand that it sounds a bit insane, but we have what we have.
  • I start to think that 400s, 1400s,1600s and 1800s possibly cover the same events. These events are outfitted with different names and uniforms, but they nevertheless are the same events. That is in my developing humble opinion.
  • ~1870s is probably where we can start looking for the beginning of our "known" times... but then we run into SF 1906 and SF 1915.
View of Campo Vaccino in Rome_1_1.jpg
  • I do think that the Bible was written after approximately year 1400 AD on the common timeline.
  • Jesus Christ is not a person. It's "Jesus Events" that we call Jesus Christ,
  • "Jesus Events" happened at least twice. The first one was accompanied by Water, the second one by Fire.
  • Timing of these "Jesus Events" is hidden in the rotating celestial bodies. That would be different Zodiac circles.
  • Peter the Great is not a real name, or if it is a real name, it belonged to someone else.
  • Google Ngram is one of the best research tools we have, and we need to use it more often.
  • All printed historical books contain lies. It's even worth with the handwritten text materials.
  • It's been East vs. West, for a relatively short period of time.
    • Was it Tartary olim Scythia representing the East?
  • Or... was it Controllers vs the survivors of various Jesus Events?
It seems to me the system has repeated the whole pandemic playbook a number of times. From those pointy beak masks through to seeing divided people in an earlier pandemic spreading msgs of not getting the Bill's Prick of their time. Like KD is showing, I wonder if our timeline is much shorter than we realise and we seem to be in a repeating loop/pattern where we reach a sort of "end game" phase - coinciding with celestial changes that the system hides from the populace.

Then another view I have is we are far more sophisticated than we realise (basically gods) and we are rendering our reality as we go. So there is no real history per se, just a current controlling narrative of a collection of bogus or recycled histories, programmed into our minds by the system through schooling to put us into a state of primitiveness and reliance on "the system" (and their education systems; govts; medical; financial etc.) So what if we were to gradually "wake up", which would then turn into a tsuanmi effect - to the idea that nothing is really real here in this so-called reality, and that our "mind over matter" capability is to come together and "will" or manifest the type of world we want. Where lands can suddenly appear at our imagination, altering maps as we know them.

For me, it does feel like we're in some sort of a dream (matrix... maya... simulation West World etc. etc.) and we're coming to the end game, just like Marvel and Hollywood telegraphed. The desperation of the system with this whole "global" event where all rationality / logic has lost and it feels like I'm in a Final Fantasy game has lead me to some of these thoughts. Nice write-up by KD as always.
I’ve heard an opinion that our so-called “nonrenewable fossil fuels” are anything but nonrenewable and fossil based.
I heard that too, here is the subtitled version of this interesting Dutch documentary about the situation in Germany where they replace the farmers and they become energy suppliers and Germany now healivy relies on import of food - which make it susceptible for shortages.
They want to do the same here in NL: replace farmers for windmills and solar panels.

I think, not sure, that oil (the Chinese already used oil and oil pipelines in x BC...)
is constantly re-invented or "rediscovered" after these windmills/ steam etc machines turns incapabel or something.

Because isn't it weird that they once used oil, stopped using it for 1500 years and suddenly they discover oil on their new found continent?

They can make diesel motors way cleaner than the construction of one Tesla nowadays.
The nucleair energy is way too "free" to make that the norm.

I am in that way not surprised that they throw a swedish company Vattenfall in the frontline of this 'energy turn' with biomass-centrales and windmill parks and a very angry swedish girl as their propaganda. Let them do the job.
While the big names keep fuelling the so-called upcoming countries.

They already don't know how to get rid of the old windmills so they just bury them..
I want to help diagnose and explain the cause of the excessive fear
A few days ago I posted a comment -I thought- but it seems that it got lost in the void between my phone and this blog.

I took the analogy of an umbrella-seller when nobody is afraid of rain - you make them afraid.
Even use puppet governments to make the people afraid first. And then sell your umbrellas.
As mentioned above, there had been more pandemics like Spanish Flu and before anybody could make serious money out of it with a decent vaccin, the flu was already gone.
But the script of peoples behavior was there.
But isn't Christianity really an offshoot of paganism if you really think about it?
Yes, that's what I mean; I'm so called 'catholic' baptised but since the invention of the Calvin and Luther the catholic church was seen as way too pagan so people started fighting about it.
In Amsterdam the catholics had to shelter while in the meanwhile the jews built the biggest Synagoge in western Europe in Amsterdam...

(Because of the rich Company trade and Surinam (Caribbean) colonies... But that's denied by most of the jews off course.
They made quite a mess in Surinam with very angry black people who ran away, hid in bushes and set their plantations and houses on fire, the colony was in decline in 1800's and mostly sold to Dutch/ Amsterdam investors who did not even live there and eventually lost a lot of money.
And now they open the slave files but they start in 1850...)

Anyway, somehow the (Roman)catholics managed to make it more "religious" with adopting all the pagan festivities (maybe even the birth of Jesus - jesuits) but personally I think the paganism kept up until +/- 1850 or even later.
So I see myself as pagan, in a way.
So what if we were to gradually "wake up",
I've been thinking about this too. We are perhaps on the verge of it now.

Some "complot guy" here in NL with an internet show mentioned This situation that was filmed in Texas. (I don't follow the American news very close so perhaps it is already mainstream?)

Busloads and busloads of foreign children like the 2021 equivalent of the orphan trains...
I didn't believe it first but now I think we indeed get replaced by people without that common history that can make us digging into our own history and prevail it.

I don't think "these people" (TPB) are capable of causing real disasters (although they are on the way with weather modification) but they can bomb libraries. But with internet it's not necessary anymore.
It seems to me the system has repeated the whole pandemic playbook a number of times. From those pointy beak masks through to seeing divided people in an earlier pandemic spreading msgs of not getting the Bill's Prick of their time. Like KD is showing, I wonder if our timeline is much shorter than we realise and we seem to be in a repeating loop/pattern where we reach a sort of "end game" phase - coinciding with celestial changes that the system hides from the populace.

Then another view I have is we are far more sophisticated than we realise (basically gods) and we are rendering our reality as we go. So there is no real history per se, just a current controlling narrative of a collection of bogus or recycled histories, programmed into our minds by the system through schooling to put us into a state of primitiveness and reliance on "the system" (and their education systems; govts; medical; financial etc.) So what if we were to gradually "wake up", which would then turn into a tsuanmi effect - to the idea that nothing is really real here in this so-called reality, and that our "mind over matter" capability is to come together and "will" or manifest the type of world we want. Where lands can suddenly appear at our imagination, altering maps as we know them.

For me, it does feel like we're in some sort of a dream (matrix... maya... simulation West World etc. etc.) and we're coming to the end game, just like Marvel and Hollywood telegraphed. The desperation of the system with this whole "global" event where all rationality / logic has lost and it feels like I'm in a Final Fantasy game has lead me to some of these thoughts. Nice write-up by KD as always.
Fixation on the end is a very powerful influential device. In his book, the Perennial Philosophy, Huxley distinguishes between religious movements that take advantage of a ‘future salvation event’ (so that the ends justify the means) and the timeless religious movements that are typically more focused on actions and behavior and less concerned about historicity.

So I would say that the predictive programming of end times and future events are nothing more than expedients that have been used time and time again for pushing agendas (even seemingly benign ones that don’t include some broad scale disasters or reset situation).

This notion of humans as gods is—I think a bit not-so-great way of phrasing a similar idea I have. I’d liken us more to malleable vessels that can be honed and focused to allow more profound conscious experiences to take place. Humility is a typical tenet of traditional beliefs, and positioning us as the gods is a quick route to pride—of which there are many tragic stories about. But I get your intention, we are a lot more that blips in a long chain of biological survival—there is something more profound to our existence that is both out of reach and gated from us by the ‘gatekeepers’.

I would say it within reach for humans to experience a profundity of consciousness that pervades time. In scenarios like these, it’s more possible to contextualize the ideas about the holographic principle of mind (also called morphic resonance, ether, etc. etc. many words for same concept of supernal consciousness). It’s from these experiences that truths are extracted and then formatted into the distortion of language.

An approach that keepers of wisdom traditions have taken over time is the intentional obfuscation of the tenets of their beliefs. The idea is that you build a fence around the truth. Distinguish historical from from timeless truth; dare to change the first to uphold the second. The logic is that wisdom is like a garden, and the fence and gate serves the purpose of preserving the garden. If the garden itself is the eternal truth, the fence is the historical distortion.You see this exact playbook occur again and again; it’s both the cause for sects and also brings about the possibility for non-seekers to spin a narrative web for some ulterior purpose (that is: other than contextualizing wisdom in a familiar tongue). To some the gate is there, that is the historical context is the way into the eternal truth.
For the seeker the gates can open. But seeking isn’t just casual reading or exposure to ideas. As I mentioned above it’s also about understanding the inherent potential to shape oneself to become the conduit for an all pervasive consciousness. When these two efforts are combined, they work in tandem and greatly promote the access of knowledge to the seeker (it’s like the same words you’ve seen hundreds of times reveal new meaning or understanding).
I found something really strange. But it is SO strange that I doubt my own sanity.

The (other) stolen history documentary told about an advanced city Manaus in the middle of nowhere and Brazil in general (check this church and street lights) and I thought: all I know is that Brazil language (Portugese) had always hurt my ears: as if Russians tried to speak Spanish.
  • But what if Russians indeed spoke Spanish?
What I know about Portugal:
  • Visigoth (Gaul, Vikings, Celts..) then a lot of nothing and suddenly they got rich (?) dominated the ocean, conquered Brazil and some places in India too and expelled the jews and then they became poor and lost Brazil and then Europe started fighting.
  • Check this:

Peter 1: Dom Pedro I (English: Peter I; 12 October 1798 – 24 September 1834), nicknamed "the Liberator", was the founder and first ruler of the Empire of Brazil.

Peter 1: Peter I Alexeyevich Romanov (9 June 1672 Moscow – 8 February 1725), nicknamed Peter the Great was Tsar of Russia from 1682 until his death in 1725.

By the grace of God, the most excellent and great sovereign emperor Pyotr Alekseevich the ruler of all the Russias: of Moscow, of Kiev, of Vladimir, of Novgorod, Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan and Tsar of Siberia, sovereign of Pskov, great prince of Smolensk, of Tver, of Yugorsk, of Perm, of Vyatka, of Bulgaria and others, sovereign and great prince of the Novgorod Lower lands, of Chernigov, of Ryazan, of Rostov, of Yaroslavl, of Belozersk, of Udora, of Kondia and the sovereign of all the northern lands, and the sovereign of the Iverian lands*, of the Kartlian and Georgian Kings, of the Kabardin lands, of Circassian and Mountain princes and many other states and lands western and eastern here and there and the successor and sovereign and ruler.

*Iberia is suddenly in Kaukasus instead of Spain/ Portugal.

But ok. Can happen.
But now.
Here it becomes cheezy:

Dona Maria I ( 17 December 1734 – 20 March 1816) was Queen of Portugal from 1777 until her death in 1816.
Known as Maria the Pious in Portugal and Maria the Mad in Brazil, she was the first undisputed queen regnant of Portugal and the first monarch of Brazil. With Napoleon's European conquests, her court, then under the direction of her son João, the Prince Regent, moved to Brazil, then a Portuguese colony.
Maria's madness was first officially noticed in 1786, when Maria had to be carried back to her apartments in a state of delirium.

Tsarina Maria Ilyinichna , born Miloslavskaya ( 1 (11) april 1624 , Moskou - 3 (13) maart 1669 , Moskou )


Joao / Johan/ John/ Ivan 13 May 1767 – 10 March 1826, nicknamed "the Clement", was King of the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves from 1816 to 1825.
Ivan received a Catholic upbringing and was by nature a very weak person and had a weak character. He was found to be too ill for the responsibility and entrepreneurial spirit of royalty. His wife, Infante Charlotte Joachime of Spain, completely dominated him.

John ( Ivan ) . ( 27 august [ 6 september ] 1666 , Moscow - januari 29 [ februari 8 ] in 1696 ) - Russian Tsar in 1682 - 1696 of the Romanov dynasty.
Son of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and Tsarina Maria Ilinichna Miloslavskaya

Ivan Alekseevich was said to be mentally retarded, which may have been the result of a disease - epilepsy , aggravated by scurvy , a chronic illness of the children of Maria Miloslavskaya

His wife
bonded strongly with her gentle and simple husband, and proved to be an exemplary wife to a mentally-challenged man. She became the mainstay of his life

And now...
QqA copy of a st Petersburg Palace in Brazilian city Petropolis
Look how happy the alleged "Emperor" and his wife looks in their alleged Palace garden.
And if you think: why were Germans going to Portugese Petropolis; well the tzars were actually Germans via the mother.

One of the Brazilian Peters (II) went on holiday to Egypt (??)

And if you think: oké, can happen, all of this; well, Peter II of Brazil received a French letter from an already dead writer (Dumas, died 1870) that he can take the place in the French academy of sciences instead of Russian (?!) Ferdinand von Wrangel .

Here is some more info about the very close Portugese - Russian ties:

The Russian Emperor Alexander II granted Pedro V of Portugal the highest order of the Russian Empire - the Order of Andrew the First Called.

Ok. Well. I'm on my way to the madhouse now and I send you all this lovely French Postcard from the funeral of the Brazilian Emperor - Le Char
I don't think "these people" (TPB) are capable of causing real disasters (although they are on the way with weather modification) but they can bomb libraries. But with internet it's not necessary anymore.
Agreed, think that it started quite a bit with the invention of the television and their rendition of the "atomic family" possibly dating back into the radio days.

Guess if you can't string them along within a religion, then you can string them along with their TV gods.
I think the controllers have repurposed old world technology and developed weapons. One such scalar weapon would be HAARP. Back in the 1980's there were only a few but now they are all over the flat planet. They can be used in concert to create a mega powerful weapon. The beam of energy is bounced off the firmament shell and then redirected at a target like buildings, weather systems, or whole regions. Weather can be controlled at will creating drought, floods, fire and crop loss. This kind of power is frightening. The record breaking weather patterns everywhere are evidence of the controllers deployment. The more we wake up to the truth, the more they panic. The controllers are getting sloppy causing more people to awaken to a critical mass paradigm shift. The armies of darkness will not prevail.
The more we wake up to the truth, the more they panic. The controllers are getting sloppy causing more people to awaken to a critical mass paradigm shift.
Will respectfully disagree with the panicking part. I don’t think controllers they really care about what we think, or about what we think we know. They either have a plan they follow, or simply adjust things at will. I could be wrong of course.
Some have said that the new world order controllers planned to roll out the pandemic hoax around 2030 but because of people waking up they had to speed up their timetable 10 years and thus they have made many mistakes. The rockerfeller document entitled operation lockstep is a white paper expaining how the pandemic was preplanned operation lockstep. They probably dont care what we think or know, but why do they put so much effort into censorship; us waking up must be dangerous to their plan somehow? Humans or dark angels make mistakes and can be defeated.
Amazing piece, once again! Your point about ‘“Horned" ones were always serious conquerors and warriors’ made me think of this picture:


Any thoughts on why they were referred to as “horned”? I’ve often wondered if the laurel crowns in old pictures also covered horns. Many times the leaves seem to find their shape and placement similar to horns.

Some people in Europe might disagree right about now.
This is indeed something because it totally fits the "global warming" agenda
People are rolling over each other that this is the prove that we have to do something. Now.
And if you think cloud seeding might cause the damage, or the fact that there had been strange circumstances then you are the complottist.
@Recognition, if you wanna play with the horned ones, here is (imho) one of the dudes that was incorporated into Alexander the Great. I think Skanderbeg was one of the most important individuals in history.

He is relatively unknown too.
Ok, I read through the wikis related to him-both his page, his weaponry, and “the myth of Skanderbeg”. @KorbenDallas if you have the time, please share your thoughts about this person, as your genius is delightfully vast and bewildering, so I’d like to see what dots you connect from his story.

R: Primary thing that stuck out to me overall was, Skanderbeg has a ton of allusions to the various military leaders noted in the OP, primarily Alexander the Great.
  • 1. His name is a shortened version of Alexander- Skander. Berg meaning mountain. From wiki: The Ottoman Turks gave him the name اسکندر بگ İskender bey or İskender beğ, meaning "Lord Alexander", or "Leader Alexander".[26] Skënderbeu, Skënderbej or Skanderbeg are the Albanian versions, with Skander being the Albanian form of "Alexander". Latinized in Barleti's version as Scanderbegi and translated into English as Skanderbeg or Scanderbeg, the combined appellative is assumed to have been a comparison of Skanderbeg's military skill to that of Alexander the Great.
  • 2. According to a report by historian Shefqet Pllana, Sami Frasheri in his Kamus-al-Alam maintains that the wording "Dhu lKarnejn" (owner of the two horns) was an appellative attributed to Alexander the Great of Macedon, the very name which Skanderbeg bore in the Islamic form.
  • 3. Nomen est omen is used in the exploitation of Skanderbeg's figure by connecting his name with Alexander the Great, who defended his territory, and implying that Skanderbeg also struggled to defend his territory from the Ottoman Empire.
  • 4. Mythologically (R: supposedly) The sword used by Skanderbeg was a present of the sultan and was endowed with magical powers.
  • 5. The horse connects the mythological hero with both earthly and spiritual powers, also making the hero look taller. The neighing of Skanderbeg's horse caused terror among his enemies. (R: reminds me of Bucephalus, Alexander’s horse).
  • 6. Papadopoulo Vretto published a biography on Skanderbeg and presented him as a defender of Christianity against the Muslim Ottomans and a 'proud Epirotan' descendant of king Pyrrhus of ancient Epirus.
  • 7. In Serbian historiography it has been supported that Skanderbeg's great-grandfather, named Branilo was a nobleman from Zeta who was granted possession of Kaninë after taking part in Emperor Stefan Dušan'sconquests. This reading is based on a mistaken translation by Karl Hopf in the 19th century and has been discredited ever since. It became popular in Serbian propaganda circles again in the 1980s, right before the crisis in Kosovo, where Serb historians again celebrated Skanderbeg as "the son of Ivan, Đorđ Kastrioti, the Serbian horseman of Albania.

His armor is shocking:
  • Skanderbeg’s helmet is made of white metal, adorned with a strip dressed in gold. On its top lies the head of a horned goat made of bronze, also dressed in gold. The bottom part bears a copper strip adorned with a monogramseparated by rosettes * IN * PE * RA * TO * RE * BT *, which means: Jhezus Nazarenus * Principi Emathie * Regi Albaniae * Terrori Osmanorum * Regi Epirotarum * Benedictat Te (Jesus Nazarene Blesses Thee.
R: Then there were the pictures of his battles. I noticed Roman style centurion costumes in several of the pics. Also that is a lot of destruction, the sky looks like it’s on fire. What kind of weaponry would create that level of obliteration?







R: I, personally, also see outlines of horns, in this image of him in a hat:


Lastly, here he is, in a gladiator fight with a Tartar.
@KorbenDallas if you have the time, please share your thoughts about this person, as your genius is delightfully vast and bewildering, so I’d like to see what dots you connect from his story.
LOL, had a good laugh.

I could only answer this as a separate article. One day... As far as pointers go:
  • His name is not a shortened version of Alexander, it's rather the other way around.
    • Iskandar, Iskander, Askander or Scandar, is the Middle East variant of the given name Alexander after Alexander the Great.
    • This Alexander the Great statement is pseudo-science, for there are no sources for that. I call it a very plausible assumption.
  • There is no original name Alexander. It's a corrupted Al-Iskandar, or Al-Scandar, etc.
  • Figure out what dragon this Gjergj slayed.
  • Dhu al-Qarnayn
  • Timur
  • Undefeated military commanders
  • Templated historical individuals
LOL, had a good laugh.

I could only answer this as a separate article. One day... As far as pointers go:
  • His name is not a shortened version of Alexander, it's rather the other way around.
    • Iskandar, Iskander, Askander or Scandar, is the Middle East variant of the given name Alexander after Alexander the Great.
    • This Alexander the Great statement is pseudo-science, for there are no sources for that. I call it a very plausible assumption.
  • There is no original name Alexander. It's a corrupted Al-Iskandar, or Al-Scandar, etc.
  • Figure out what dragon this Gjergj slayed.
  • Dhu al-Qarnayn
  • Timur
  • Undefeated military commanders
  • Templated historical individuals
Yeah just looking through these reccs, it is overwhelming, I see why you laughed. Really, Fomenko was quite incredible to have not been daunted by the repeating, echoing names and stories, while examining chronology, and instead saw the patterns (as do you KD). We can all keep working together to sort it out!

Some things that stuck out:

The legend of Gog and Magog and the gates were also interpolated into the Alexander romances. In one version, "Goth and Magothy" are kings of the Unclean Nations, driven beyond a mountain pass by Alexander, and blocked from returning by his new wall. Gog and Magog are said to engage in human cannibalism in the romances and derived literature. They have also been depicted on Medieval cosmological maps, or mappae mundi, sometimes alongside Alexander's wall

The tale of Gogmagog's ancestry was composed later in the 14th century. Known as the "Albina story" (or Des Grantz Geanz), it claimed Gogmagog to be a giant descended from Albina and her sisters, thirty daughters of the king of Greece exiled to the land later to be known as "Albion".[6][8][9] This story was added as a prologue to later versions of Brut pseudo-history,[10]

Thus according to the Middle English prose version of the Brut, known as the Chronicles of England, Albina was the daughter of Syrian king named Diodicias, from whom Gogmagog and Laugherigan and the other giants of Albion are descended. These giants lived in caves and hills until being conquered by Brutus' party arriving in "Tottenesse" (Totnes, Devon). A later chapter describes Gogmagog's combat Corineus (Middle English:Coryn) "at Totttenes", more or less as according to Geoffrey. Gogmagog was the tallest of these giants; Coryn in comparison was at least the largest man from the waist upward among Brutus's crew. Caxton's printed edition, The Cronycles of Englond (1482), closely matches this content.


The Lord Mayor's account of Gogmagog says that the Roman Emperor Diocletian had thirty-three wicked daughters. He found thirty-three husbands for them to curb their wicked ways; they chafed at this, and under the leadership of the eldest sister, Alba, they murdered their husbands. For this crime they were set adrift at sea; they washed ashore on a windswept island, which they named "Albion"—after Alba. Here they coupled with demons and gave birth to a race of giants, whose descendants included Gog and Magog. The effigies of two giants were recorded in 1558 at the coronation of Elizabeth I and were described as "Gogmagot the Albion" and "Corineus the Britain".

Works of Irish mythology, including the Lebor Gabála Érenn (the Book of Invasions), expand on the Genesis account of Magog as the son of Japheth and make him the ancestor to the Irish through Partholón, leader of the first group to colonize Ireland after the Deluge, and a descendant of Magog, as also were the Milesians, the people of the 5th invasion of Ireland. Magog was also the progenitor of the Scythians, as well as of numerous other races across Europe and Central Asia. His three sons were Baath, Jobhath, and Fathochta.

R: A lot of this reminds me of your post Hypothesis: Mutiny in the Sky or a Short History of the World. Still trying to put it together. But it does seem to be suggesting that the Scythians/Tartarians were genetically “unclean” and destroyed by this Alexander/Iskander/Jesus nation, event, or being. Are you thinking something similar?

P.S. I found this signature/date page for the “chronicles of England” (Where I found the pic of Gogmagog fighting Brutus in Elizabethan style clothing), and thought you might like to look at the symbolism for the date, and make sense of it.

Last edited:
Figure out what dragon this Gjergj slayed

You mean this dragon?


A little bit more emphasis on the dragon-serpent intentional conflation.

An excerpt from here

George is the Great Kham. George. Ginghis. Alexander. Iskander. Nebuchanzzer. Two horned man. Whatever title floats your boat- all the same individual.

“Slaying the dragon” was always code for: destruction to the People Of the Book (living in idolatry) and the capture of their land.


...indoctrinated perspectives and garage-stacked parallel historical narratives are hard to shake.
I thought you might enjoy this... There is just too much to unpack with the works of Hornius and Grotius but here's more references to the Beala family.

De Originibvs Americanis Libri Qvatvor -1652

Hochelagiensium King Agouhanna (Iroquois term for Chief/Leader) Bal Hunnicum.
Hochelaga (Iroquois territority) King Leader Bal the Hun. (Agou... HannaBal?)

Et hinc Bela Regium apud Hunnos nomen
And here the Bela Royalty/Kingdom with Hunnic name

sicut etiam familia Principum Russiæ appellatur Beala
and as the first Russian family named Beala

Goes on to talk about how the origins are from Hungary, how Atilla was a robber and terror, and how the name in Peru is similar to that of Attala from Incan origins. Connections to Tartarians, Turks, Mexicans, and Peruvians are frequent.

Regardless there's just so much to unpack from those two authors with all these references which make no sense given our current historical narratives. Either they were the initial powers that be accepted narrative rewrite over whatever history they were hiding or their works were so widely published that a few of their books made it through all the burnings.
Great article and replies. Thanks. What do you think are the main reasons the historical narritive writers and chronologists have gone to such lengths to hide the true time lines? My theory is that it's an attempt to us all feel small and insignificant. Other vast timelines include the Big Bang Theory (formulated by a Jesuit priest Georges Lemaitre) and Darwin's Theory.
Great article and replies. Thanks. What do you think are the main reasons the historical narritive writers and chronologists have gone to such lengths to hide the true time lines? My theory is that it's an attempt to us all feel small and insignificant. Other vast timelines include the Big Bang Theory (formulated by a Jesuit priest Georges Lemaitre) and Darwin's Theory.
I've always thought it was possible that writers/chronologists just honestly got it wrong. Scaliger was just a dude who tried to piece together the whole history of the whole world and accidentally copied parts of it. Of course this is the least nefarious take on it.

Also note that this may be the best thread in SH history. I legit want KD to write a book. Back to reading it another time through.