1889 Post-Fire Seattle rebuild speed: 5,625 buildings in 18 months

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#1
There is something very bizarre in the history of Seattle. It is related to the Great Seattle Fire of 1889, followed by an enormous construction boom of 1889-90. This construction "on steroids" is something I would like to talk about. The numbers are really off the charts, so bear with me.

The Great Fire itself will not be the main focus of this article. The time to talk about this fiery fire destroying 120 acres of the City of Seattle, and killing exactly ZERO people will come at a later day.

Let us establish the time frame for this investigation. The disaster struck on 6.6.1889. Some of the documented facts presented below were published on 1.1.1891. Basically, we have 18 months to work with.

Next, let's try to figure out the amount of damage sustained by Seattle. This is where we are going to run in into the first controversy. Let's see who reports what:
Seattle_fire_25_blocks_1889.png Inked_PI-Fire-1889_1.jpg Seattle_fire_60_blocks_1889.png Inked_Seattle_fire_64_blocks_1889.jpg

Looks like our sources have no consensus on the matter. May be the maps (below) displaying areas of damages can provide a better picture. Apparently they could not agree on how to count blocks. I can see some double blocks in the diagram on the right, and it could be the reason.

Map_seattle_fire_1889_1.jpg Map_seattle_fire_1889_2.png Map_of_Seattle's_great_fire_of_1889-06-06.png

Well, now let us take a look at what was supposedly achieved by 12.31.1890. At first let us take a look at the Seattle PI issue dated 1.1.1891

1890_rebuild_1.png 1890_Seattle_Buildings_col_1.jpg 1890_Seattle_Buildings-page-001_1.jpg 1890_Seattle_Buildings_1-page-001.jpg 1890_Seattle_Buildings_2-page-001.jpg

The article above claims, that by 1.1.1891, "There were constructed in Seattle and suburbs during 1890, and are in course of construction, 2,160 buildings." Down below on the same page it states:
  • Business district, completed........100
  • Business district, incomplete.......15
  • Outside business district.............. 1,460
  • Suburbs............................................... 585
  • TOTAL................................................... 2,160
To understand what kind of buildings were built please read the first column of page one. Impressive beyond believe.

And of course we had to have this paragraph below:

1889_Seattle_Buildings.jpg
According to Seattle PI, in 1889 there were 3,465 buildings constructed, and 1890 was not as impressive. There is also a direct reference to all these 3,465 building being built after the Great Fire.

Apparently between 6.6.1889 and 1.1.1891 (18 months) the following was achieved:
  • all the mess was cleaned up
  • 40+ miles of railroad track built
  • 5,625 buildings constructed = 312.5 a month = 10.4 buildings a day with no days, and no nights off
In the same first column of the first page it states, "It is not too much to say that no other city of 50,000 inhabitants in the United States can make such a remarkable showing of great rows of business blocks constructed in the most artistic, costly, and expensive manner."

With 50k inhabitants Seattle PI is giving Seattle too much credit: 1890 census - 43,467 with approximately 10,000 being children (second image is the source).

Seattle-1891-Demographics.png Seattle-1891-cover.png

Now let us take a look at some of those constructed buildings they are talking about. Just to understand the scale:

starr-boyd-seattle.jpg Pioneer_Building_1890.jpeg Hotel_Seattle.jpg Seattle_Harrisburg_Building.gif
Somehow, the above buildings resemble the ones from this article I wrote.

* * * * *

So we have all these damages and need to rebuild. Following the Fire, there was a new rule enacted: no more wooden buildings could be constructed. And what do we need to rebuild in accordance with the new directive? Naturally it would be some sort of (1) construction infrastructure and (2) sufficient quantity of qualified builders. Let us see if there were any of the above two.

Seattle was famous for its Henry Yesler's sawmill. Did Seattle have a brick factory? One company claims it did. Let us look at what this company says about their contribution to the "rebuild Seattle" efforts of 1889-1890. Here it is, "As a local family owned and operated company with fifth-generation family leadership, Mutual Materials was founded in 1900 by Daniel Houlahan as Builders Brick Company. Following the Great Seattle Fire of 1890, our brick literally rebuilt Seattle and can be seen in many historic buildings today."

Not sure why they do not know that the Great Seattle Fire took place in 1889, but it's on them. They got established in 1900. This is well outside of the time frame we are interested in (6.6.1889 - 12.31.1890). Appears the rebuilding we are interested in was not impacted by the below company.

brick_supplier.png

Not so fast... there was this experienced brick layer Daniel Houlahan. He came from California to help with paving roads. Coincidentally, this gentleman is also the founder of the Builders Brick Company. Later the name was changed to MutualMaterials, which is the same company mentioned above, and founded in 1900.

Here is some of the Seattle Brick-Making History. From this article we can get two things:
  • Brick layers and masons came from all over the United States to help Seattle rebuild.
  • While working in Seattle, Daniel Houlahan looked for a clay deposit to use for a brick plant. He eventually found an ideal location at the base of Beacon Hill. The deposit was close enough to Puget Sound to allow brick to be efficiently transported by scow (barge).
Nowhere does it say how many brick layers and masons came over to rebuild Seattle. One way or another it had to be enough to erect 10 buildings a day... in 1890.

Brick laying process is shown here (video): Building with bricks or blocks!

Back to Daniel Houlahan's clay brick plant; it was not hard to find some information about brick making in the 19th century. Building a brick making factory from scratch in 1889-1890 was probably super demanding. Let us look at this article and see how productive this newly established brick factory could be: BRICKMAKING in the USA: A BRIEF HISTORY. And below I will present some photos of brick making process back then.

dry.jpg turning.jpg pugmill.jpg
mould.jpg garnermould.jpg appleton.jpg dumpingclay.jpg
This is what a brick factory looks like in the 21st century (video): This is how we produce bricks today!
Honestly, I do not know what needed to happen for such a factory to be making enough bricks for 10 buildings a day. At the same time this company claims that their brick literally rebuilt Seattle. I will leave it at that.

Of course, mysterious architects like Elmer H Fisher did not make anyone's life any easier by designing some tremendously beautiful and complicated buildings. Look at those windows. I wonder how measuring and ordering went in 1890. This is our Pioneer Building. It alone has hundreds of windows. I think I've read at some point that windows were coming from California. I might be wrong on this one, but windows for this "boom" are as mysterious as this entire story.

Windows_pioneer_building.png


Now let us take a look at the below stonework. I do not even know what to say. Beautiful it is. But for the lack of the better word, this is just crazy. Especially considering the time limits we are working with. And remember, this is only one building. Be realistic, how much time is it gonna take to build a building like this today? Those super-craftsmen of the past probably had to do it in 2-3 days just to keep up with the pace.

b4-3.png

Construction equipment: well, I would like to know what it was but I was unable to find anything of significance in various photo libraries. As a matter of fact, the construction process is just as bizarre as this entire story.

Now let us move on to some photos. First we need to establish a point in time based on a known object. For that I will use that very same Pioneer Building. We have this 1891 publication showing our Pioneer Building. Bird's eye view of Seattle'1891 has Pioneer Building on there: Library of Congress. Meanwhile Wikipedia says that its construction started in 1889 and finished in 1892. I honestly do not know what they were doing to this building in 1892 and 1891, but in the 8.23.1890 issue of the Oregon based West Shore illustrated journal everything was up and running.

WS-Seattle_1.png pioneer-square_1890.jpg seattle-map-1891-rebuild.jpg

One thing we can somewhat be sure of, is that the construction started some time in 1889 after the fire. And yes, we do have some pictures. We are going to be looking North on Front street (today it's 1st Avenue) from Yesler Way. Remember, it is 1889, sometime between 6.6.1889 and 12.31.1889.

This is the Pioneer Building in the right bottom corner. It is supposedly being built. I am not sure all this scenery looks like a construction zone. I did not live back then but it reminds me of some sort of destruction, rather than construction.

b1.png b2.png b1-1.png
Now, everything you see to your front (in the above pictures) is supposed to be brand spanking new, because all the previous buildings were destroyed by fire. Below pictures represent the general area after the fire. Do those buildings above look new to you?

Looking east on Yesler Way from Post St., Seattle, June 5, 1889.png looking north on 1st Ave. S. at Yesler toward the ruins of the Yesler-Leary Building.png Ruins of the Occidental Hotel, June 1889.png occidental-ruins-w-crew-1889.jpg Ruins of Yesler-Leary Building, aftermath of the Seattle Fire of June 6, 1889.png west_from_second_columbia.jpg
3-occidental-ruins-w-crew-web.jpg con114.JPG great-fire-waterfront-ruins-then.jpg Seat_fire.jpg


* * *
Kudos goes to Seattle PI. On 06.07.1889, after their building and all the equipment were destroyed on 06.06.1889, they had enough magic left to produce the entire sequence of events. That's right, the Fire started at 2:15 pm on 6.6.1889, and was out at 3 am on 6.7.1889. A few hours later Seattle PI produces this:

PI-Fire.jpg
With one (wrong guy was blamed) or two minor corrections,
this is still your official version of what happened that day.

I thought the fastest profession in this entire story was a brick layer. It turned out to be a reporter. Stranger things happen, I suppose.

Short summary: I do not believe it was possible in 1889-90 for Seattle to pull this off. That said, I do not know where all the buildings came from, or when. May be they dug them out during the Great Seattle Regrade. Or may be we need to ask San Francisco.

regrade_seattle.JPG regrade_seattle_2.png

P.S. At least the Fire in Seattle was started by a human. Chicago had to settle for a cow.

UPDATE: Seattle is not alone, there were hundreds of cities which suffered a very similar fate: Urban Fire verdict: global attack on our civilization or incompetency?
 
Last edited:

in cahoots

Active member
Messages
77
Likes
206
#2
I haven't got through the article yet, but Korben, my dude. It's weird... I've studied a lot about the deceptions in North American history on a time-scale of 10-20,000 years ago, concerning the younger Dryas period and knowledge of advanced astronomy and architecture and craftsmanship from back then (Praise Hancock!!). However your stuff hits much closer to home on the timescale and I have seen your theory of some kind of continental conflagration/New World cultural reset nowhere before.

I live in Vancouver, BC, and while I've always known there was "a big fire" in our history. I've even been in one of the *very* few buildings which survived it, but never read too far into. The City of Vancouver is not that big a deal, really, with population below 10,000 at the time. Well, I looked it up just now, and, what the fuck? It was in 1886....... just a few months after the city was incorporated, and the same year the hospital and police force were established.

Right after a massive inferno.

I was even wondering about the house I rent, which is pretty damn old. Still, it barely misses your 1906 cutoff date. My interest is piqued, you're onto something here.
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#3
I have not looked into the Vancouver Fire in depth just yet. But I could guess, that immediately after the fire there was some sort of a super fast re-build involved. Look it up :)

None of those houses will checkout from the perspective of any documented proof. Architects will have a sketch trace at best. There is a set of common coincidence in all of these cases.
 

in cahoots

Active member
Messages
77
Likes
206
#4
I'm getting chills here... There's more...

Wikipedia's only source for my local version this event -- mind you, probably the biggest or second-biggest disaster in the city's history -- is a secondary source for an anniversary event commemorating the fire... other articles link to dead-end sources, but here are some interesting clues as to the nature of the fire....

"Most likely, the sudden burst of strong wind that allowed the fire to obliterate the city in less than an hour showered embers on several locations. .... The heat became so intense that buildings and the clothes on people’s backs burst into flames. Eyewitness accounts get truly gruesome. ... Some people, like George Bailey, the bartender at the swanky Burrard Hotel, went mad and were unable to save themselves." "Went mad"?? What does that mean!!

Here, even the journalist is suspicious:

"The Great Fire is almost too perfect an origin myth: the story of determined pioneers persevering through an unthinkably tragic disaster and going on to create a great city out of the ashes. Most incredibly, survivors saw their misfortune as an opportunity to build a better city – this time with bricks – and within a few short days new buildings mushroomed and businesses began reopening. “Our city is their monument,” wrote city archivist Major Matthews."

I'll have to track down some information on the rebuild and the construction archives
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#5
Exactly my friend. This same very pattern is present in every single "Great City Fire" case. Welcome to he club!
 

PiotrRasputin

New member
Messages
10
Likes
15
#6
Same story, similar circumstances, same miraculous (impossible?) rebuilds all over the place You’re certainly on to something here Korben.
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#7
What I find interesting is that those new re-built buildings pop up at a rate of a 3D printer’s printing abilities. And with all the elaborate stone work, it is hard to believe that there were humans back then capable of creating anything of this magnitude.
 

Falkes

Member
Messages
14
Likes
53
#8
What I find interesting is "fires" can destroy complete brick buildings but the majority of the wooden electrical poles are mostly untouched and few seem fully destroyed. Sort of like the recent "fires" in California.
Where houses and cars are completely destroyed, tires and windows melted right out of cars. Paint burned away ... yet many trees are still standing, some houses remain untouched, a lot of grass is still green yet right next to clearly completely destroyed buildings. That's not how fire works.
 

in cahoots

Active member
Messages
77
Likes
206
#9
What I find interesting is "fires" can destroy complete brick buildings but the majority of the wooden electrical poles are mostly untouched and few seem fully destroyed. Sort of like the recent "fires" in California.
Where houses and cars are completely destroyed, tires and windows melted right out of cars. Paint burned away ... yet many trees are still standing, some houses remain untouched, a lot of grass is still green yet right next to clearly completely destroyed buildings. That's not how fire works.
It's interesting - this "choosy" fire.

Are you familiar with the fascinating observations of Dr. Judith Wood, sexiest woman alive? She, too, has located "strange fires" at the sites of great conflagrations.
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#10
Agree on the trees. At the same time in the contemporary residential areas everything is made out of plywood, at least in the US. I would like to see what it did to the brick buildings.

In the 19th, early 20th century fires it looks like the shock wave arrived straight from above. Based on the trees with canopy, there was no shock wave.
 

Dirigible

Active member
Messages
138
Likes
210
#11
Reading this made me think of another famous city fire in 1864, when Sherman burnt Atlanta to the ground... Haven't done detailed research, could it be related?
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#12
Reading this made me think of another famous city fire in 1864, when Sherman burnt Atlanta to the ground... Haven't done detailed research, could it be related?
Some will blame on the early days of photography, but there are not many photos related to the 1864 battle of Atlanta. We mostly have paintings, and those do not show much. Judging by this article, "Who burnt Atlanta", it definitely fits the pattern.

atlanta_destruction_1864.png
Notably, 400 houses out of 3,600 sure does not sound like 37%.

I am a firm believer that everything within that time frame was related to the same global event, and was not limited to the continental United States.
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#14
hmmm they dug them out?
Or printed on a 3D printer, or Free Masons have a super skill of being able to do whatever with stone super fast, or... you just might be right. The Great Seattle Regrade was a formidable operation indeed.

Denny_Regrade-1.jpg

So was Chicago's, raising the entire city by 6 feet.

Briggs_house.jpg chicago_move.jpg

Bizarre things they were doing those days....
 

humanoidlord

Well-known member
Messages
648
Likes
368
#15
Or printed on a 3D printer, or Free Masons have a super skill of being able to do whatever with stone super fast, or... you just might be right. The Great Seattle Regrade was a formidable operation indeed.

View attachment 1632

So was Chicago's, raising the entire city by 6 feet.

View attachment 1633 View attachment 1634

Bizarre things they were doing those days....
o_0 wtf!
i swear the more i reserach this subject, more weird it becomes
 
OP
OP
KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Negotiator
Messages
2,126
Likes
3,981
#17
Another aspect to take into consideration would be ZERO human casualty suffered during the Great Seattle Fire. From the probability stand point even. Somewhat highly bizarre.
 

humanoidlord

Well-known member
Messages
648
Likes
368
#18
@humanoidlord A theory is emerging regarding the use of VIBRATIONAL techniques in the shaping and long-distance movement of megalithic stone
what are those?
Another aspect to take into consideration would be ZERO human casualty suffered during the Great Seattle Fire. From the probability stand point even. Somewhat highly bizarre.
very odd, its like they just wanted to destroy the buildings
 

Similar threads

Top